Searching over 5,500,000 cases.


searching
Buy This Entire Record For $7.95

Official citation and/or docket number and footnotes (if any) for this case available with purchase.

Learn more about what you receive with purchase of this case.

Cramer v. Michael Yant Target Corp.

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA -- FRESNO DIVISION


August 6, 2010

MATTHEW B. CRAMER, PLAINTIFF,
v.
MICHAEL YANT TARGET CORPORATION ET AL., DEFENDANTS.

The opinion of the court was delivered by: Sheila K. Oberto United States Magistrate Judge

COMPLAINT ON ORDER DIRECTING U.S. MARSHAL TO SERVE THE FIRST AMENDED

On May 4, 2009, the Court determined that service was appropriate on Defendant Michael Yant. Plaintiff was unable to ascertain the location of Defendant Yant so that he could be served. On May 27, 2010, Plaintiff filed a motion that the Court construed as a motion for the issuance of a subpoena duces tecum to Target Corporation to produce the last known address of its former employee Michael Yant. Target Corporation has complied with the subpoena.

Accordingly, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED THAT:

1. The Clerk of the Court:

(a) Complete a summons and a USM-285 form as to Michael Yant.See Doc. 111; and

(b) Forward the summons, USM-285 form, and two copies of the First Amended Complaint to the U.S. Marshal.

2. The U.S. Marshal SHALL SERVE the First Amended Complaint and summons on Michael Yant.

3. THE RETURNED SUMMONS SHALL BE FILED UNDER SEAL.

IT IS SO ORDERED.

20100806

© 1992-2010 VersusLaw Inc.



Buy This Entire Record For $7.95

Official citation and/or docket number and footnotes (if any) for this case available with purchase.

Learn more about what you receive with purchase of this case.