Searching over 5,500,000 cases.


searching
Buy This Entire Record For $7.95

Official citation and/or docket number and footnotes (if any) for this case available with purchase.

Learn more about what you receive with purchase of this case.

MedImmune, LLC v. PDL BioPharma

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA SAN JOSE DIVISION


August 9, 2010

MEDIMMUNE, LLC, PLAINTIFF,
v.
PDL BIOPHARMA, INC., DEFENDANT.

The opinion of the court was delivered by: The Honorable Jeremy Fogel United States District Court Judge

STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED] ORDER APPOINTING SPECIAL MASTER MARTIN QUINN Action Filed: December 16, 2008

Pursuant to Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 53, and with the consent of the plaintiff and counterclaim defendant, MedImmune, LLC ("MedImmune"), and the defendant and counterclaim plaintiff, PDL BioPharma, Inc. ("PDL"), the Court hereby appoints Martin Quinn, Esq. as Special Master to assist the Court with discovery in this litigation (hereinafter "Special Master").

The Special Master is hereby appointed pursuant to Rule 53(a)(1) to perform duties consented to by the parties (Rule 53(a)(1)(A)), and to address pretrial discovery matters that cannot be addressed effectively and timely by an available district judge or magistrate judge of the district (Rule 53(a)(1)(C)).

Pursuant to Rule 53(a)(2) and 53(b)(3), the Special Master shall promptly file an affidavit with this Court stating that, if true, he has no relationship to the parties, counsel, action, or Court that would require disqualification of a judge under 28 U.S.C. section 455. During the course of these proceedings, the Special Master and the parties shall notify this Court immediately if they become aware of any potential grounds that would require disqualification.

Pursuant to Rule 53(a)(3), the Court has considered the fairness of imposing the likely expenses of the Special Master on the parties. The Court believes that the appointment and use of the Special Master will materially advance the litigation, thereby achieving considerable cost-saving to all parties. Moreover, the Court notes that the parties have consented to the Special Master's appointment and have agreed to pay the compensation ordered herein. The Court will protect against unreasonable expenses and delay through regular communication with the Special Master.

Pursuant to Rule 53(b)(1) the Court gave all parties to the proceedings notice of its intent to appoint the Special Master and an opportunity to be heard with respect to such appointment before issuing this Order.

Pursuant to Rule 53(b)(2), the Court hereby directs the Special Master to proceed with all reasonable diligence in performing his duties.

Pursuant to Rule 53(b)(2)(A), the Special Master shall assist the Court with management of discovery pursuant to the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure, and in particular Rule 26 and with adjudication of all discovery motions and disputes between the parties in this matter pursuant to Rules 37 or 45. All currently pending discovery motions and disputes between the parties are hereby referred to the Special Master pursuant to this Order.

The Special Master shall have the authority provided in Rule 53(c) and 53(d).

The procedural requirements contained in this Court's Local Rules and/or Pretrial Orders shall govern any motion practice before the Special Master subject to the Special Master's discretion to adopt reasonable alternative procedural requirements with notice to the parties thereof.

Pursuant to Rule 53(b)(2)(B), the Special Master may communicate ex parte with the Court at any time. The Special Master shall not communicate ex parte with any party, third party witness, or counsel for any party or third party.

Pursuant to Rule 53(b)(2)(C), the Special Master shall maintain orderly files consisting of all documents submitted to him by the parties and any of his written orders, findings, and/or recommendations. Pursuant to Rule 53(e), the Special Master shall file any written orders, findings, and/or recommendations with the Court via the Court's Electronic Case Filing ("ECF").

Such filing shall fulfill the Special Master's duty to serve his order on the parties.

Pursuant to Rule 53(b)(2)(E) and 53(g), the Special Master shall be compensated at an hourly rate of $600.00 for his services pursuant to this Order. The Special Master shall not charge for travel time. The Special Master shall prepare a monthly invoice for his services, which he shall provide to counsel for the parties. MedImmune and PDL shall each be responsible for paying one-half of the Special Master's invoice; such invoices shall be paid promptly.

Pursuant to Rule 53(f), the Special Master shall report to the Court as directed by the Court.

Pursuant to Rule 53(b)(2)(D) and 53(f), the following procedures shall govern any action on the Special Master's orders, reports, and/or recommendations: Any party wishing to file objections to or a motion to adopt or modify the Special Master's orders, reports, and/or recommendations must file such objections or motion with the Court within seven (7) days from the day the Special Master filed the order, report, and/or recommendation via ECF. Any Order issued by the Special Master shall remain in effect pending any such objection or motion, unless the Special Master holds otherwise. A party may, however, move to stay the Special Master's order pending review by the Court. The party filing the objection or motion shall submit with such objection or motion any record necessary for the Court to review the Special Master's order, report, and/or recommendation, including any transcripts of proceedings before the Special Master and any documents submitted by the parties in connection with the Special Master's order, report, and/or recommendation. Failure to provide the record shall constitute grounds for the Court to overrule the objection or deny the motion. No such objection or motion may be filed by any party after seven (7) days from the day the Special Master filed the order, report, and/or recommendation via ECF. Pursuant to the parties' stipulation, the Court shall review findings of fact made or recommended by the Special Master for clear error. The Court shall review de novo any conclusions of law made or recommended by the Special Master. The Court will set aside the Special Master's ruling on a procedural matter only for an abuse of discretion.

Pursuant to Rule 53(f)(1), in acting on an order, report, or recommendations of the Special Master, the Court shall afford each party an opportunity to be heard and, in its discretion, may receive evidence, and may adopt or affirm; modify; wholly or partly reject or reverse; resubmit to the Special Master with instructions; or make any further orders it deems appropriate.

IT IS SO STIPULATED.

PURSUANT TO STIPULATION, IT IS SO ORDERED.

20100809

© 1992-2010 VersusLaw Inc.



Buy This Entire Record For $7.95

Official citation and/or docket number and footnotes (if any) for this case available with purchase.

Learn more about what you receive with purchase of this case.