Searching over 5,500,000 cases.


searching
Buy This Entire Record For $7.95

Official citation and/or docket number and footnotes (if any) for this case available with purchase.

Learn more about what you receive with purchase of this case.

Yeager v. AT&T Mobility

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA


August 9, 2010

GENERAL CHARLES E. "CHUCK" YEAGER (RET.), PLAINTIFF,
v.
AT&T MOBILITY, LLC. DEFENDANT.
GENERAL CHARLES E. "CHUCK" YEAGER (RET.), PLAINTIFF,
v.
AVIAT AIRCRAFT, INC., ET. AL., DEFENDANTS.

ORDER OF NON-RELATED CASES

The undersigned judge declines to relate the above-captioned cases pursuant to Local Rule 123(a). Assignment of the matters to the same judge is not likely to effect a substantial savings of judicial effort or other economies. These actions involve the same plaintiff, but the actions involve events specific to each party, the questions of fact are different, the questions of law are not novel, it is not clear that the same result should follow in these actions, and assignment to different judges would not entail substantial duplication of labor.

Therefore, CIV. S-10-2055 JAM EFB shall not be reassigned to the undersigned judge.

IT IS SO ORDERED.

20100809

© 1992-2010 VersusLaw Inc.



Buy This Entire Record For $7.95

Official citation and/or docket number and footnotes (if any) for this case available with purchase.

Learn more about what you receive with purchase of this case.