The opinion of the court was delivered by: Andrew J. Guilford U. S. District Judge
JUDGMENT AND PROBATION/COMMITMENT ORDER
In the presence of the attorney for the government, the defendant appeared in person on this date. 08 09 2010
X WITH COUNSEL Elizabeth Macias, DFPD
X GUILTY, and the court being satisfied that there is a factual basis for the plea. NOLO
There being a finding/verdict of X GUILTY, defendant has been convicted as charged of the offense(s) of: Felon In Possession of a Firearm in violation of 18 USC §§ 922(g)(1) as charged in the Single Count Indictment.
The Court asked whether defendant had anything to say why judgment should not be pronounced. Because no sufficient cause to the contrary was shown, or appeared to the Court, the Court adjudged the defendant guilty as charged and convicted and ordered that:
It is ordered that the defendant shall pay to the United States a special assessment of $100, which is due
All fines are waived as it is found that the defendant does not have the ability to pay.
Under the Sentencing Reform Act of 1984, it is the judgment of the Court that the defendant, John William Doble, is hereby committed on Count 1 of the Single-Count Indictment to the custody of the Bureau of Prisons to be imprisoned for a term of 12 months and one day.
Upon release from imprisonment, the defendant shall be placed on supervised release for a term of two years under the following terms and conditions:
The defendant shall comply with the rules and regulations of the
U. S. Probation Office and General Order 05-02;
The defendant shall refrain from any unlawful use of a controlled substance. The defendant shall submit to one drug test within 15 days of release from imprisonment and at least two periodic drug tests thereafter, not to exceed eight tests per month, as directed by the Probation Officer. The Probation Officer is instructed by the Court to assure that the drug testing provisions set forth do not in any way interfere with Mr. Doble's efforts to obtain employment and remain employed. Specifically, the Court notes that Mr. Doble is likely to be in the construction industry which requires that employees report very early in the morning, and to the extent drug testing would interfere with that, Mr. Doble's employment would take precedence over that;
During the period of community supervision the defendant shall pay the special assessment in accordance with this judgment's orders pertaining to such payment; and
The defendant shall cooperate in the collection of a DNA sample from the defendant.
It is further ordered that the defendant surrender himself to the institution designated by the Bureau of Prisons on or before 12:00 noon, on November 12, 2010. Defendant to remain under the previous terms and conditions of release pending his surrender date.
Defendant is advised of his appeal rights.
The Court recommends that the defendant be housed in a Southern California institution to facilitate visitation with ...