Searching over 5,500,000 cases.


searching
Buy This Entire Record For $7.95

Official citation and/or docket number and footnotes (if any) for this case available with purchase.

Learn more about what you receive with purchase of this case.

United States v. Bodine

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA


August 11, 2010

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, PLAINTIFF,
v.
TIMOTHY DAVID BODINE, DEFENDANT.

The opinion of the court was delivered by: Judge Hon. Lawrence J. O'Neill

STIPULATION TO CONTINUE STATUS CONFERENCE AND ORDER THEREON Date: September 17, 2010 Time: 8:45 a.m.

IT IS HEREBY STIPULATED by and between the parties hereto through their respective counsel, DAVID L. GAPPA, Assistant United States Attorney, and ERIC V. KERSTEN, Assistant Federal Defender, counsel for Defendant Timothy David Bodine, that the date for status conference may be continued to September 17, 2010, or the soonest date thereafter that is convenient to the court. The date currently set for status conference is August 13, 2010 at 8:45 a.m.. The requested new date is September 17, 2010 at 8:45 a.m..

This continuance is requested to allow time for further defense investigation and trial preparation. Defense counsel is scheduled to view evidence maintained on a hard drive at the F.B.I. office on August 18, 2010. It is also anticipated that additional discovery will soon be received from the government. The requested continuance will allow counsel to view the images, review the additional discovery, engage in preliminary plea negotiations and determine whether it will be necessary to retain a defense expert to conduct a forensic examination of the computer hard drive.

The parties agree that the delay resulting from the continuance shall be excluded as necessary for effective defense preparation pursuant to 18 U.S.C. §§ 3161(h)(7)(A) and (B)(iv). For this reason, the ends of justice served by the granting of the requested continuance outweigh the interests of the public and the defendant in a speedy trial.

ORDER

Good cause has been stated. The intervening period of delay is excluded in the interests of justice pursuant to 18 U.S.C. §§ 3161(h)(7)(A) and (B)(iv).

IT IS SO ORDERED.

Lawrence J. O'Neill UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE

20100811

© 1992-2010 VersusLaw Inc.



Buy This Entire Record For $7.95

Official citation and/or docket number and footnotes (if any) for this case available with purchase.

Learn more about what you receive with purchase of this case.