IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
August 11, 2010
ERNEST MILLER, PLAINTIFF,
B. STOWELL, ET AL., DEFENDANTS.
The opinion of the court was delivered by: Garland E. Burrell, Jr. United States District Judge
On July 22, 2010, plaintiff filed a document styled, "Notice of Motion Objections By Plaintiff," which the court construes as a request for reconsideration of the magistrate judge's order filed July 8, 2010. In that order, the magistrate judge found plaintiff ineligible to proceed in forma pauperis pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1915(g) and ordered plaintiff to pay the $350.00 filing fee. Pursuant to E.D. Local Rule 303(f), a magistrate judge's orders shall be upheld unless "clearly erroneous or contrary to law." Upon review of the entire file, the court finds that it does not appear that the magistrate judge's ruling was clearly erroneous or contrary to law.
Therefore, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that:
1. Upon reconsideration, the order of the magistrate judge filed July 8, 2010, is affirmed; and
2. Within fifteen days from the service of this order, plaintiff shall pay the $350.00 filing fee. Failure to pay the filing fee will result in the dismissal of this action without prejudice.
© 1992-2010 VersusLaw Inc.