Searching over 5,500,000 cases.


searching
Buy This Entire Record For $7.95

Official citation and/or docket number and footnotes (if any) for this case available with purchase.

Learn more about what you receive with purchase of this case.

National Union Fire Insurance Co. of Pittsburgh v. Resources Development Services

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA SAN JOSE DIVISION


August 13, 2010

NATIONAL UNION FIRE INSURANCE COMPANY OF PITTSBURGH, PLAINTIFF,
v.
RESOURCE DEVELOPMENT SERVICES, INC. ET AL., DEFENDANTS.

The opinion of the court was delivered by: Jeremy Fogel United States District Judge

STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED] ORDER EXTENDING TIME FOR DEFENDANTS RESOURCE DEVELOPMENT SERVICES, INC. AND JAMES LUCERO TO ANSWER OR OTHERWISE RESPOND TO FIRST AMENDED COMPLAINT

WHEREAS plaintiff National Union Fire Insurance Company of Pittsburgh ("National Union") filed its original complaint in this action on March 29, 2010;

WHEREAS defendants Resources Development Services, Inc. ("RDS") and James Lucero were not served with a copy of the original complaint;

WHEREAS plaintiff National Union filed a First Amended Complaint on June 1, 2010;

WHEREAS defendants RDS and James Lucero were served with a copy of the First Amended Complaint on or about July 22, 2010;

WHEREAS defendants RDS and James Lucero have 21 days to answer or otherwise respond to the First Amended Complaint pursuant to Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 12(a)(1);

WHEREAS defendants RDS and James Lucero recently retained counsel to represent them in this matter;

WHEREAS counsel for defendants RDS and James Lucero require additional time to review the First Amendment Complaint and prepare an answer or other response thereto;

WHEREAS plaintiff's counsel does not object to extending the time in which defendants RDS and James Lucero may answer or otherwise respond to the First Amended Complaint;

WHEREAS the next hearing in this matter is presently scheduled for September 24, 2010;

IT IS HEREBY AGREED AND STIPULATED that the deadline by which defendants RDS and James Lucero must answer or otherwise respond to the First Amended Complaint should be extended to September 3, 2010.

IT IS SO STIPULATED.

DATED: August 11, 2010

MARTÍN A. SABELLI JOSH A. COHEN Attorneys for Defendants Resources Development Services, Inc. and James Lucero

DATED: August 11, 2010

ROPERS, MAJESKI, KOHN & BENTLEY EUGENE SUH Attorneys for Plaintiff

ORDER

By stipulation, and for good cause shown, it is hereby ordered that defendants Resources Development Services, Inc. and James Lucero shall have until September 3, 2010 to answer or otherwise respond to the First Amended Complaint.

IT IS SO ORDERED.

20100813

© 1992-2010 VersusLaw Inc.



Buy This Entire Record For $7.95

Official citation and/or docket number and footnotes (if any) for this case available with purchase.

Learn more about what you receive with purchase of this case.