IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT CENTRAL DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
August 13, 2010
MARIA MEJIA, AN INDIVIDUAL PLAINTIFF,
JOSEPH COMONFORT, AN INDIVIDUAL DEFENDANT.
The opinion of the court was delivered by: Honorable Otis D. Wright United States District Judge
PRELIMINARY INJUNCTION ORDER
TO ALL PARTIES AND THEIR COUNSEL OF RECORD:
The Order to Show Cause why a preliminary injunction should not issue came for hearing before this Court in Courtroom 11 at 3:00 p.m on August 13, 2010. Plaintiff Maria Mejia appeared by Counsel, Barbara Schultz of Legal Aid Foundation of Los Angeles and Michelle Uzeta of Housing Rights Center. Defendant did not appear. Upon consideration for motion for preliminary injunction, and for good cause shown,
IT IS HEREBY ORDERED as follows:
Preliminary Injunction Order
Based on Plaintiff's application for a temporary restraining order, the pleadings, declarations and exhibits in support of this application, and upon the affidavit of Plaintiff's counsel that notice was provided to Defendant in advance of this application, the Court finds that Plaintiff has demonstrated that serious irreparable hardship will occur unless an injunction is granted, Plaintiff has a substantial likelihood of success on the merits of her claims, and the balance of hardships tips sharply in favor of Plaintiff. The Court further finds that the public interest will be served by ensuring that Defendant complies with the requirements of Federal and State anti-discrimination and civil rights statutes.
IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that Defendant, his officers, agents, employees and attorneys, and all persons acting by, through, under, or in concert with him are HEREBY RESTRAINED AND ENJOINED from:
A. Taking any steps to rent the residential rental unit located at 153 1/2 S. Anderson Street, in Los Angeles, California, to anyone other than Plaintiff, (or, if 153 1/2 S. Anderson is unavailable, from renting the first available ground-floor unit to anyone other than Plaintiff);
B. Discriminating in the terms, conditions, or privileges of Plaintiff's rental of the subject property, or in the provision of services or facilities in connection with the subject property because of her disability; and
C. Coercing, intimidating, threatening, or interfering with Plaintiff in the exercise or enjoyment of the rights granted or protected under the Federal Fair Housing Amendments Act and California Fair Employment and Housing Act.
This Order and all papers submitted in support of Plaintiff's ex parte application and motion for preliminary injunction shall be served on Defendants by overnight delivery by no later than August 18, 2010.
IT IS SO ORDERED.
© 1992-2010 VersusLaw Inc.