Searching over 5,500,000 cases.


searching
Buy This Entire Record For $7.95

Download the entire decision to receive the complete text, official citation,
docket number, dissents and concurrences, and footnotes for this case.

Learn more about what you receive with purchase of this case.

Kim-C1, LLC v. Valent Biosciences Corp.

August 13, 2010

KIM-C1, LLC, PETITIONER,
v.
VALENT BIOSCIENCES CORPORATION, RESPONDENT.



ORDER PERMITTING RESPONSE TO SUR-REPLY

The Court permitted the filing of sur-replies as part of an order that moved the hearing on respective motions to confirm and vacate arbitration. See Court's Docket Doc. No. 45. Petitioner filed a sur-reply, but Respondent did not. On August 3, 2010, Respondent objected to Petitioner's sur-reply and argued that Petitioner switched positions, made new arguments, and misstated the holdings of cited cases.

The Court will not strike Petitioner's sur-reply. Instead, Respondent may file a response to the sur-reply. The Court does not foresee any further briefing by either party.

Accordingly, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that Respondent may file a response to Petitioner's sur-reply on or by 3:00 p.m. on August 20, 2010, but the response to the sur-reply may not exceed 15 total pages.

IT IS SO ORDERED.

20100813

© 1992-2010 VersusLaw ...

Buy This Entire Record For $7.95

Download the entire decision to receive the complete text, official citation,
docket number, dissents and concurrences, and footnotes for this case.

Learn more about what you receive with purchase of this case.