Searching over 5,500,000 cases.


searching
Buy This Entire Record For $7.95

Official citation and/or docket number and footnotes (if any) for this case available with purchase.

Learn more about what you receive with purchase of this case.

Abarca v. Merck & Co

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA


August 13, 2010

ABARCA, RAUL VALENCIA, ET AL., PLAINTIFFS,
v.
MERCK & CO, INC., ET AL., DEFENDANTS.

The opinion of the court was delivered by: Oliver W. Wanger United States District Judge

ORDER GRANTING REQUEST FOR LEAVE TO ENLARGE PAGE LIMITS FOR REPLY BRIEFS IN SUPPORT OF MOTIONS TO EXCLUDE TESTIMONY OF (1) R. DOUGLAS BARTLETT, AND (2) CAMILLE SEARS

Pursuant to Paragraph 3 of this Court's Standing Order, the request of Defendants Merck & Co., Inc., Amsted Industries, Inc., Baltimore Aircoil Company, Inc. and Track Four, Inc. (collectively the "BAC Defendants") for leave to file (1) an enlarged Reply in Support of the BAC Defendants' Motion to Exclude Testimony of Plaintiffs' Expert Witness R. Douglas Bartlett, and (2) an enlarged Reply in Support of the BAC Defendants' Motion to Exclude Testimony of Plaintiffs' Expert Witness Camille Sears of no more than 12 pages in length each is hereby GRANTED. The BAC Defendants' (1) Reply in Support of the BAC Defendants' Motion to Exclude Testimony of Plaintiffs' Expert Witness R. Douglas Bartlett, and (2) Reply in Support of the BAC Defendants' Motion to Exclude Testimony of Plaintiffs' Expert Witness Camille Sears shall each not exceed 12 pages, and shall be filed using 13-point font.

IT IS SO ORDERED.

20100813

© 1992-2010 VersusLaw Inc.



Buy This Entire Record For $7.95

Official citation and/or docket number and footnotes (if any) for this case available with purchase.

Learn more about what you receive with purchase of this case.