Searching over 5,500,000 cases.


searching
Buy This Entire Record For $7.95

Official citation and/or docket number and footnotes (if any) for this case available with purchase.

Learn more about what you receive with purchase of this case.

Rushdan v. Perbula

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA


August 23, 2010

SALADIN RUSHDAN, PLAINTIFF,
v.
T. PERBULA, ET AL., DEFENDANTS.

The opinion of the court was delivered by: Kendall J. Newman United States Magistrate Judge

ORDER

Plaintiff is a state prisoner proceeding without counsel with a civil rights action pursuant to 42 U.S.C. § 1983. On July 23, 2010, plaintiff filed a motion for certificate of appealability. (Dkt. No. 72.) However, certificates of appealability are only required in habeas proceedings filed pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 2254 or 28 U.S.C. § 2255. 28 U.S.C. § 2253. Accordingly, plaintiff's motion will be denied as unnecessary.

On August 19, 2010, plaintiff filed a document entitled "Motion of Objection to Judges Decision Dated: August 6, 2010." (Dkt. No. 75.) Plaintiff states he mailed objections to the findings and recommendations on or about June 24, 2010. Plaintiff seeks a stay or "reversal" of the court's order "until the court or the prison locates said motion." (Id.) Plaintiff is advised that the court did not receive the objections and, until plaintiff re-sends a copy of the objections, the court cannot stay or reverse its order.

In accordance with the above, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that:

1. Plaintiff's July 23, 2010 motion (Dkt. No. 72) is denied; and

2. Plaintiff's August 19, 2010 motion (Dkt. No. 75) is denied.

20100823

© 1992-2010 VersusLaw Inc.



Buy This Entire Record For $7.95

Official citation and/or docket number and footnotes (if any) for this case available with purchase.

Learn more about what you receive with purchase of this case.