Searching over 5,500,000 cases.


searching
Buy This Entire Record For $7.95

Official citation and/or docket number and footnotes (if any) for this case available with purchase.

Learn more about what you receive with purchase of this case.

Inman v. Suntrust Mortgage

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA


August 24, 2010

SCOTT INMAN, PLAINTIFF,
v.
SUNTRUST MORTGAGE, INC., MTC FINANCIAL, INC. DBA TRUSTEE CORPS., AND DOES 1-10 INCLUSIVE, DEFENDANTS.

ORDER VACATING HEARING

Currently pending before this Court is Defendant MTC Financial, Inc.'s Rule 12(b)(6) motion to dismiss. Hearing on this motion is set for August 30, 2010. Pursuant to Local Rule 230(c), Plaintiff was required to file either an opposition or a notice of non-opposition no later than August 16, 2010. Plaintiff failed to do so. Due to Plaintiff's failure to file a timely opposition or notice of non-opposition, he is in violation of the Local Rules. See Local Rule 230(c). Plaintiff is not entitled to be heard at oral argument in opposition to the motion. See id. The Court has reviewed Defendant's motion and the applicable law, and has determined that the motion is suitable for decision without oral argument. See Local Rule 230(h).

Accordingly, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that the August 30, 2010, hearing on Defendant's motion is VACATED and that the parties shall not appear on that date. As of August 30, 2010, the Court will take the matter under submission and thereafter issue a decision. IT IS SO ORDERED.

20100824

© 1992-2010 VersusLaw Inc.



Buy This Entire Record For $7.95

Official citation and/or docket number and footnotes (if any) for this case available with purchase.

Learn more about what you receive with purchase of this case.