Searching over 5,500,000 cases.


searching
Buy This Entire Record For $7.95

Official citation and/or docket number and footnotes (if any) for this case available with purchase.

Learn more about what you receive with purchase of this case.

Rosenblum v. Ellis

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA


August 26, 2010

PHILLIP JON ROSENBLUM, PLAINTIFF,
v.
C/O ELLIS, ET AL., DEFENDANTS.

The opinion of the court was delivered by: Gary S. Austin United States Magistrate Judge

ORDER VACATING FINDINGS AND ) ECOMMENDATIONS AND DENYING MOTION FOR EXTENSION OF TIME (Docs. 61, 63)

Plaintiff is a state prisoner proceeding pro se in this civil rights action. The matter was referred to a United States Magistrate Judge pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1)(B) and Local Rule 302.

On July 15, 2010, findings and recommendations were entered, recommending dismissal of this action for Plaintiff's failure to prosecute. The recommendation was based on Plaintiff's failure to file an amended complaint in compliance with an earlier order. On July 20, 2010, Plaintiff filed a first amended complaint, on which this action now proceeds. On August 20, 2010, Plaintiff filed a motion for extension of time in which to file objections to the findings and recommendations. Because Plaintiff has filed a first amended complaint, the Court will vacate the recommendation of dismissal. Plaintiff's request for an extension of time to file objections is therefore moot.

Accordingly, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that:

1. The July 15, 2010, recommendation of dismissal is vacated.

2. Plaintiff's motion for extension of time filed on August 20, 2010, is denied as moot.

IT IS SO ORDERED.

20100826

© 1992-2010 VersusLaw Inc.



Buy This Entire Record For $7.95

Official citation and/or docket number and footnotes (if any) for this case available with purchase.

Learn more about what you receive with purchase of this case.