IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
September 1, 2010
ASIS INTERNET SERVICES, ET AL., PLAINTIFFS,
SUBSCRIBERBASE, ET AL., DEFENDANTS.
ORDER RE: ADMINISTRATIVE MOTION
Before the Court is an Administrative Motion by Defendants For the Northern Dist Subscriberbase, et al. ("Defendants") to file documents under seal.
ECF No. 40 ("Admin. Mot.") Defendants seek to file under seal portions of documents produced in discovery by Plaintiff Asis Internet Services ("Asis"), as well as portions of Defendants' Opposition to Asis's Motion to Dismiss all Defendants, ECF No. 38 ("Opp'n"), which references these documents. Admin. Mot. at 2.
While there is a protective order in place in this action, ECF No. 32, these documents were not designated as confidential by Asis when it produced them. Admin. Mot. at 2. Defendants seek to file these documents under seal because they "contain banking and finance information for ASIS and its principal Nella White," and "ASIS or Nella White may consider this information Confidential."
Civil Local Rule 79-5(d) provides the procedure for filing under seal documents designated confidential by another party.
Under this rule, the moving party must file an administrative motion with the court. The designating party then has seven days to preserve the documents' confidentiality by filing and serving a "declaration establishing that the designated information is sealable" and "a narrowly tailored proposed sealing order." Id.
Asis did not designate these documents as confidential, nor did it file a responsive declaration or sealing order. For these 0 reasons, Defendants' Administrative Motion to file the documents and its Opposition under seal is DENIED. Pursuant to Civil Local Rule 79-5(e), Defendants shall retain the documents and its Opposition and not make them part of the record in the case, or, within four days, re-submit unredacted versions of the documents and Opposition for filing in the public record.
IT IS SO ORDERED.
© 1992-2010 VersusLaw Inc.