UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT CENTRAL DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
September 1, 2010
BILLY RAY BARNES JR.
MICHAEL S. CORONA, ET AL.
The opinion of the court was delivered by: The Honorable Frederick F. Mumm, United States Magistrate Judge
CIVIL MINUTES - GENERAL
Proceedings: (IN CHAMBERS)
ORDER TO SHOW CAUSE RE PLAINTIFF'S ADDRESS
On August 13, 2010, the Court issued an Order Re Defendants's Motion to Dismiss. The service copy of that order sent to plaintiff has since been returned to the Court as "Attempted-Not Known."
Pursuant to Local Rule 41-6:
A party proceeding pro se shall keep the Court and opposing parties apprised of such party's current address and telephone number, if any. If mail directed by the Clerk to a pro se plaintiff's address of record is returned undelivered by the Postal Service, and if, within fifteen (15) days of the service date, such plaintiff fails to notify, in writing, the Court and opposing parties of said plaintiff's current address, the Court may dismiss the action with or without prejudice for want of prosecution.
Rule 41-6; see Carey v. King, 856 F.2d 1439, 1440-41 (9th Cir. 1988).
Plaintiff is ordered to show cause within fifteen (15) days of the date of this order why this action should not be dismissed for his failure to inform the Court of his change address.
Failure to file a timely response to this order within the time specified will be deemed consent to the dismissal of this action.
© 1992-2010 VersusLaw Inc.