UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
September 2, 2010
MICHAEL CONTRERAZ, PLAINTIFF,
J. STOCKBRIDGE, ET AL., DEFENDANTS.
The opinion of the court was delivered by: Lawrence J. O'Neill United States District Judge
ORDER VACATING DEFENDANTS' MOTION TO DISMISS FROM COURT'S CALENDAR PENDING OBJECTION DEADLINE
On August 17, 2009, Defendants Rodriguez and Cota filed a motion to dismiss, and the Magistrate Judge recommended the motion be granted on February 4, 2010. Due to Plaintiff's inability to complete and file objections, resolved in a separate order, the Court cannot yet rule on the motion. Therefore, in light of 28 U.S.C. § 476(a)(1), the Civil Justice Reform Act, Defendants' motion to dismiss is DEEMED VACATED from the Court's calendar until (1) Plaintiff files his objections and Defendants' response, if any, is timely filed, or (2) the sixty-day objection period expires without receipt of objections.*fn1
IT IS SO ORDERED.