Searching over 5,500,000 cases.


searching
Buy This Entire Record For $7.95

Download the entire decision to receive the complete text, official citation,
docket number, dissents and concurrences, and footnotes for this case.

Learn more about what you receive with purchase of this case.

Contreraz v. Stockbridge

September 2, 2010

MICHAEL CONTRERAZ, PLAINTIFF,
v.
J. STOCKBRIDGE, ET AL., DEFENDANTS.



The opinion of the court was delivered by: Lawrence J. O'Neill United States District Judge

ORDER VACATING DEFENDANTS' MOTION TO DISMISS FROM COURT'S CALENDAR PENDING OBJECTION DEADLINE

(Doc. 22)

On August 17, 2009, Defendants Rodriguez and Cota filed a motion to dismiss, and the Magistrate Judge recommended the motion be granted on February 4, 2010. Due to Plaintiff's inability to complete and file objections, resolved in a separate order, the Court cannot yet rule on the motion. Therefore, in light of 28 U.S.C. § 476(a)(1), the Civil Justice Reform Act, Defendants' motion to dismiss is DEEMED VACATED from the Court's calendar until (1) Plaintiff files his objections and Defendants' response, if any, is timely filed, or (2) the sixty-day objection period expires without receipt of objections.*fn1

IT IS SO ...


Buy This Entire Record For $7.95

Download the entire decision to receive the complete text, official citation,
docket number, dissents and concurrences, and footnotes for this case.

Learn more about what you receive with purchase of this case.