Searching over 5,500,000 cases.


searching
Buy This Entire Record For $7.95

Official citation and/or docket number and footnotes (if any) for this case available with purchase.

Learn more about what you receive with purchase of this case.

Chism v. Adams

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA


September 9, 2010

BRANDON CHISM, PETITIONER,
v.
D. ADAMS, RESPONDENT.

ORDER

Petitioner, a state prison inmate proceeding with counsel*fn1 with a petition for a writ of habeas corpus, has timely filed a notice of appeal from the judgment dated August 6, 2010, denying his petition for a writ of habeas corpus. He has also filed a motion to proceed in forma pauperis.

Rule 24(a) of the Federal Rules of Appellate Procedure provides that a party to a district court action who desires to proceed in forma pauperis on appeal must file a motion in the district court which:

(A) shows in the detail prescribed by Form 4 of the Appendix of Forms the party's inability to pay or to give security for fees and costs;

(B) claims an entitlement to redress; and

(C) states the issues that the party intends to present on appeal.

Fed. R. App. P. 24(a)(1). Petitioner has demonstrated his inability to pay but has not otherwise complied with the rule.

Accordingly, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that petitioner's motion to proceed in forma pauperis on appeal (docket no. 72) is denied without prejudice.


Buy This Entire Record For $7.95

Official citation and/or docket number and footnotes (if any) for this case available with purchase.

Learn more about what you receive with purchase of this case.