Searching over 5,500,000 cases.


searching
Buy This Entire Record For $7.95

Official citation and/or docket number and footnotes (if any) for this case available with purchase.

Learn more about what you receive with purchase of this case.

Sokolsky v. Voss

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA


September 10, 2010

MARK S. SOKOLSKY, PLAINTIFF,
v.
W. T. VOSS, ET AL., DEFENDANTS.

The opinion of the court was delivered by: Sandra M. Snyder United States Magistrate Judge

ORDER REQUIRING PLAINTIFF TO FILE RESPONSE TO DEFENDANTS' MOTION FOR SUMMARY JUDGMENT

(Doc. 28)

Plaintiff Mark S. Sokolsky is a civil detainee proceeding pro se and in forma pauperis in this civil rights action pursuant to 42 U.S.C. § 1983. This action is proceeding on Plaintiff's second amended complaint, filed May 5, 2008, against Defendants Voss and Bresler. On July 19, 2010, Defendants filed a motion for summary judgment. Plaintiff failed to file an opposition or a statement of non-opposition to the motion. Local Rule 230(l).

Accordingly, it is HEREBY ORDERED that:

1. Plaintiff shall file an opposition or a statement of non-opposition to Defendants' motion for summary judgment within thirty (30) days from the date of service of this order; and

2 The failure to respond to Defendants' motion in compliance with this order will result in dismissal of this action, with prejudice, for failure to prosecute.

IT IS SO ORDERED.

20100910

© 1992-2010 VersusLaw Inc.



Buy This Entire Record For $7.95

Official citation and/or docket number and footnotes (if any) for this case available with purchase.

Learn more about what you receive with purchase of this case.