JUDGMENT AND PROBATION/COMMITMENT ORDER MONTH DAY YEAR
In the presence of the attorney for the government, the defendant appeared in person on this date. 9 13 10
WITH COUNSEL David A. Kettel, Retained; Richard M. Steingard, Retained
X GUILTY, and the court being satisfied that there is a factual basis for the plea.
NOLO CONTENDERE NOT GUILTY
There being a finding/verdict of GUILTY, defendant has been convicted as charged of the offense(s) of:
18 U.S.C. §371: Conspiracy to Commit Fraud and Misuse of Visas, Permits and Other Documents - Count 1 of the Second Superseding Indictment The Court asked whether there was any reason why judgment should not be pronounced. Because no sufficient cause to the contrary was shown, or appeared to the Court, the Court adjudged the defendant guilty as charged and convicted and ordered that: Pursuant to the Sentencing Reform Act of 1984, it is the judgment of the Court that defendant, Behzad Zaman, is committed on Count 1 of the Second Superseding Indictment to the custody of the Bureau of Prisons to be imprisoned for a term of 24 months. On release from imprisonment, the defendant shall be placed on supervised release for a term of three years under the following terms
The defendant shall comply with the rules and regulations of the U. S. Probation Office and General Order 05-02;
During the period of community supervision the defendant shall pay the fine and special assessment in accordance with this judgment's orders pertaining to such payment;
The defendant shall not engage, as whole or partial owner, employee or otherwise, in any business involving the issuance of immigration Form I-20s, or involves the use, access, or control of the Student Exchange Visitors Information System (SEVIS), without the express written approval of the Probation Officer prior to engagement in such employment. Further, the defendant shall provide the Probation Officer with access to any and all business records, client lists and other records pertaining to the operation of any business owned, in whole or in part, by the defendant, as directed by the Probation Officer;
The defendant shall not be employed in any position that requires licensing and/or certification by any local, state or federal agency without prior approval of the Probation Officer; and The defendant shall cooperate in the collection of a DNA sample from the defendant.
The drug testing condition mandated by statute is suspended based on the Court's determination that the defendant poses a low risk of future
It is ordered that the defendant shall pay to the United States a special assessment of $100, which is due immediately.
It is ordered that the defendant shall pay to the United States a total fine of $50,000, which shall bear interest as provided by law. The fine shall
The defendant shall comply with General Order No. 01-05.
The Court grants the government's oral motion to dismiss the remaining counts of the Indictment in this matter and all Counts in case number
The Court recommends that defendant be incarcerated in the Southern California area.
It is further ordered that the defendant surrender himself to the institution designated by the Bureau of Prisons on or before 12 noon on January 10, 2011. In the absence of such designation, the defendant shall report on or before the same date and time, to the United States Marshal located at ...