IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
September 14, 2010
JAMES EVANS, PLAINTIFF,
FELKER, ET AL., DEFENDANTS.
Plaintiff has again moved for the appointment of counsel.*fn1 As the court has previously noted, the United States Supreme Court has ruled that district courts lack authority to require counsel to represent indigent prisoners in § 1983 cases. Mallard v. United States Dist. Court, 490 U.S. 296, 298 (1989). In certain exceptional circumstances, the court may request the voluntary assistance of counsel pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1915(e)(1). Terrell v. Brewer, 935 F.2d 1015, 1017 (9th Cir. 1991); Wood v. Housewright, 900 F.2d 1332, 1335-36 (9th Cir. 1990). In the present case, the court does not find the required exceptional circumstances. Plaintiff's motion for the appointment of counsel will therefore be denied.
Plaintiff also moves for a thirty day extension of time to "file" discovery. It is unclear from the motion whether plaintiff seeks an extension of time to respond to an outstanding discovery request, or to serve a discovery request on defendants, or to take some other action with respect to discovery. Accordingly, the motion will be denied without prejudice.
Accordingly, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that:
1. Plaintiff's September 3, 2010 motion for the appointment of counsel is denied; and
2. Plaintiff's September 3, 2010 motion for extension of time is denied without prejudice.