Searching over 5,500,000 cases.


searching
Buy This Entire Record For $7.95

Download the entire decision to receive the complete text, official citation,
docket number, dissents and concurrences, and footnotes for this case.

Learn more about what you receive with purchase of this case.

In re Chase Bank USA

September 15, 2010

IN RE: CHASE BANK USA, N.A. "CHECK LOAN" CONTRACT LITIGATION


The opinion of the court was delivered by: The Honorable Maxine M. Chesney United States District Court Judge

THIS DOCUMENT RELATES TO: STIPULATED [Proposed] ORDER ALL CASES. REMOVING AND ADDING PUTATIVE CLASS REPRESENTATIVES

MDL No. 2032

and putative class representatives in the operative Master Class Action Complaint filed in this 3 matter on July 26, 2009 ("Master Complaint"); named plaintiffs and putative class representatives in this matter;

WHEREAS, Margaret Conley, Marc Zimet, and JoAnn Candelaria were named plaintiffs

WHEREAS, Margaret Conley, Marc Zimet, and JoAnn Candelaria wish to withdraw as

WHEREAS, the parties have agreed that Margaret Conley, Marc Zimet, and JoAnn Candelaria should be permitted to withdraw as named plaintiffs and putative class representatives in this matter; the putative class, as defined in the Master Complaint, the statute of limitations for their claims are tolled to the same extent and in the same manner as for all other putative class members; defined in the Master Complaint;

class representatives in the Master Complaint;

WHEREAS, because Margaret Conley, Marc Zimet, and JoAnn Candelaria remain within

WHEREAS, James Hanisch and Frederic Soliman are members of the putative class, as

WHEREAS, James Hanisch and Frederic Soliman were not named plaintiffs or putative

WHEREAS, Plaintiffs, by and through their counsel, wish to add James Hanisch and Frederic Soliman as named plaintiffs and putative class representatives in this matter;

WHEREAS, the parties have agreed that Plaintiffs should be permitted to add James Hanisch and Frederic Soliman as named plaintiffs and putative class representatives in this matter;

WHEREAS, the parties agree that an amended complaint need not be filed, and that Defendants need not amend their Answer and Affirmative Defenses to the Master Complaint; concede that this action is appropriate for class certification, and do not concede that the claims alleged in the Master Complaint ...


Buy This Entire Record For $7.95

Download the entire decision to receive the complete text, official citation,
docket number, dissents and concurrences, and footnotes for this case.

Learn more about what you receive with purchase of this case.