UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
September 17, 2010
JOHN J. RILEY, ON BEHALF OF HIMSELF AND OTHERS SIMILARLY SITUATED, AND ON BEHALF OF THE GENERAL PUBLIC, PLAINTIFF,
CITY AND COUNTY OF SAN FRANCISCO, DOES 1-20, INCLUSIVE, DEFENDANT.
The opinion of the court was delivered by: The Honorable Susan Illston United States District Court
STIPULATED APPLICATION FOR ONE-DAY EXTENSION TO FILE REPLY BRIEFS; [PROPOSED] ORDER Trial Date: None Set
The parties' cross-motions for partial summary judgment are set for hearing on October 1, 2010. Currently, plaintiff's reply/opposition brief is due September 20, 2010, and defendant's reply brief is due September 24, 2010. Counsel for the defendant now has a previously-unanticipated conflict that will interfere with the City's ability to file its reply on September 24, 2010. Accordingly, the parties file this stipulated application to extend the due date for each side's brief by one day, so that plaintiff's reply/opposition is due September 21, 2010, and defendant's reply is due September 27, 2010.
IT IS SO STIPULATED: Dated: September 16, 2010 DENNIS J. HERRERA City Attorney WAYNE SNODGRASS VINCE CHHABRIA Deputy City Attorneys By: s/Vince Chhabria VINCE CHHABRIA Attorneys for Defendant CITY AND COUNTY OF SAN FRANCISCO
Dated: September 16, 2010 By: **s/Deborah England Deborah C. England Attorney for Plaintiff JOHN J. RILEY
**Pursuant to GO 45, the electronic signatory has obtained approval from this signatory.
PURSUANT TO STIPULATION, IT IS SO ORDERED THAT the plaintiff's reply/opposition is due no later than September 21, 2010, and the defendant's reply is due no later than September 27, 2010.
© 1992-2010 VersusLaw Inc.