IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
September 17, 2010
RICHARD WAYNE PARKER, PLAINTIFF,
UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF JUSTICE, AT AL., DEFENDANTS.
This case is before the undersigned pursuant to Eastern District of California Local Rule 302(c)(21). See 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1). On May 20, 2010, the court granted plaintiff's application to proceed in forma pauperis in this action and order that service of process be made by the U.S. Marshal.*fn1 Dckt. No. 5. Also on May 20, 2010, the undersigned issued an order setting a status (pretrial scheduling) conference in this action on September 29, 2010, and directed the parties to file status reports in advance of that conference. Dckt. No. 6.
Both parties filed status reports as ordered. Dckt. Nos. 19, 20. In his status report, plaintiff, who is incarcerated, indicates that the institution at which he is located is currently on lockdown, and he therefore requests to appear at the September 29, 2010 status conference telephonically. Dckt. No. 19. In their status report, defendants state that because they are currently still in the process of complying with the Freedom of Information Act ("FOIA"), which is the basis of plaintiff's complaint, and because the timing of completion of FOIA compliance is uncertain at this time, the status conference should be vacated and defendant should be required to file a status report within approximately 60 days. Dckt. No. 20.
In light of defendants' representations, the September 29, 2010 status conference in this action will be continued and plaintiff's request to appear at the September 29, 2010 status conference will be denied as moot.
Accordingly, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that:
1. The September 29, 2010 status conference is continued to December 15, 2010 at 10:00 a.m. in Courtroom 24.
2. On or before December 1, 2010, defendants shall file a further status report addressing the issues raised in the May 20, 2010 order, Dckt. No. 6, and addressing the status of defendants' FOIA compliance.
3. Plaintiff is not required to file a further status report or a response to defendants' status report, but if he elects to do so, any such status report or response to defendants' status report shall be filed on or before December 8, 2010.
4. Plaintiff's request to appear telephonically at the September 29, 2010 status conference, Dckt. No. 19, is denied as moot.