Searching over 5,500,000 cases.


searching
Buy This Entire Record For $7.95

Download the entire decision to receive the complete text, official citation,
docket number, dissents and concurrences, and footnotes for this case.

Learn more about what you receive with purchase of this case.

Johnson v. Zartosht

September 17, 2010

SCOTT N. JOHNSON, PLAINTIFF,
v.
ZARTOSHT, INC., ET AL., DEFENDANTS.



ORDER

The court is in receipt of defendant Zartosht, Inc.'s, "Answer to Complaint" [Docket #5], filed by Mehdi Behmard in propria persona. It is well established that "a corporation may appear in the federal courts only through licensed counsel." Rowland v. California Men's Colony, 506 U.S. 194, 202 (1993) (emphasis added). Because no licensed counsel has appeared for the corporate defendant, there has been no proper appearance by defendant Zartosht, Inc. Accordingly, the "Answer to Complaint" [Docket #5] is STRICKEN as to defendant Zartosht, Inc. Defendant Zartosht, Inc is granted fourteen (14) days from the issuance of this order to properly appear in this action through licensed counsel.

IT IS SO ORDERED.

20100917

© 1992-2010 VersusLaw ...

Buy This Entire Record For $7.95

Download the entire decision to receive the complete text, official citation,
docket number, dissents and concurrences, and footnotes for this case.

Learn more about what you receive with purchase of this case.