IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
September 19, 2010
MACK A WEST, JR., PETITIONER,
KATHLEEN DICKINSON, WARDEN, RESPONDENT.
On September 14, 2010, petitioner filed a motion seeking an order from the court requiring "respondent to furnish his legal property." However, in his motion, petitioner fails to clearly explain what property he is allegedly missing, where his property might be held, or whether he has tried to resolve this matter through the normal prison administrative grievance process. The court will therefore deny petitioner's motion without prejudice. Plaintiff may re-file his motion if his requests for administrative relief prove to be unfruitful.*fn1
Accordingly, for the reasons set forth above, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that plaintiff's September 14, 2010 motion "to order respondent to furnish his legal property" (Doc. No. 36) is denied without prejudice.