Searching over 5,500,000 cases.


searching
Buy This Entire Record For $7.95

Official citation and/or docket number and footnotes (if any) for this case available with purchase.

Learn more about what you receive with purchase of this case.

Federal Home Loan Bank of San Francisco v. Deutsche Bank Securities Inc.

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA


September 20, 2010

FEDERAL HOME LOAN BANK OF SAN FRANCISCO, PLAINTIFF,
v.
DEUTSCHE BANK SECURITIES INC., ET. AL., DEFENDANTS.

The opinion of the court was delivered by: Honorable Samuel Conti United States District Court Judge

STIPULATED REQUEST FOR AN ORDER EXTENDING TIME FOR BRIEFING ON PLAINTIFF'S MOTION TO REMAND AND [PROPOSED] ORDER

Pursuant to Civil Local Rules 6-1(b), 6-2(a) and 7-4(b) for the Northern District of California, the parties, by and through their undersigned attorneys, stipulate as follows:

WHEREAS on August 11, 2010, Plaintiffs filed a motion to remand this action and its related case, Federal Home Loan Bank of San Francisco v. Credit Suisse Securities (USA) LLC, et al., No. 3:10-cv-03045-SC, to the California Superior Court for the County of San Francisco; motions to remand both cases (the UBS defendants may file a short supplemental opposition addressing party-specific points);

WHEREAS, defendants are preparing to file a single omnibus brief opposing plaintiff's

WHEREAS, defendants' opposition and plaintiff's reply briefs are currently due on September 20 and October 12 2010, respectively; may not exceed 25 pages of text and the reply brief or memorandum may not exceed 15 pages of text; and require an additional five pages to brief their consolidated arguments.

WHEREAS, pursuant to Civil Local Rule 7-4(b), memoranda filed with opposition papers

WHEREAS, defendants require four additional days to prepare the omnibus brief, and

NOW, THEREFORE, SUBJECT TO APPROVAL OF THE COURT, IT IS HEREBY STIPULATED by and between the parties to this action, through their counsel of record, as follows:

1. Defendants shall file their opposition to plaintiff's motion to remand on or before September 24, 2010;

2. Defendants may have up to 30 pages for their omnibus opposition to plaintiff's motion to remand;

3. Plaintiff shall file its reply in support of the motion to remand on or before October 19, 2010;

4. Plaintiff shall have up to 20 pages for its reply to defendants' omnibus opposition.

IT IS SO STIPULATED.

ORDER

PURSUANT TO STIPULATION, IT IS SO ORDERED.

General Order 45, Section X.B, I hereby attest that Darryl P. Rains, counsel for Defendants Hartman, counsel for Plaintiff Federal Home Loan Bank of San Francisco; Neil A. Potischman, counsel for Defendant Morgan Stanley & Co. Incorporated, Deepa V. Sood, counsel for Products, Inc.; John D. Pernick, counsel for Defendants J.P. Morgan Securities, Inc., Structured Corporation, and Washington Mutual Mortgage Securities Corporation; Robert J. Stumpf, Jr., counsel for Defendant Credit Suisse Securities (USA), LLC, f/k/a Credit Suisse First Boston RBS Holdings USA Inc.; and William F. Sullivan, counsel for Defendants UBS Securities, LLC and Mortgage Asset Securitization Transactions, Inc. concurred in this filing.

GENERAL ORDER 45 ATTESTATION I, Anne K. Davis, am the ECF User whose ID and password was used to file this Countrywide Securities Corporation and Merrill Lynch, Pierce, Fenner & Smith, Inc.; Anne H. Defendants Deutsche Bank Securities, Inc., Deutsche Alt-A Securities, Inc. and DB Structured Asset Mortgage Investments II, Inc., The Bear Sterns Companies, LLC, WaMu Capital LLC; Alexis Coll-Very, counsel for Defendants RBS Securities Inc., RBS Acceptance Inc., and Anne K. Davis

20100920

© 1992-2010 VersusLaw Inc.



Buy This Entire Record For $7.95

Official citation and/or docket number and footnotes (if any) for this case available with purchase.

Learn more about what you receive with purchase of this case.