Searching over 5,500,000 cases.


searching
Buy This Entire Record For $7.95

Official citation and/or docket number and footnotes (if any) for this case available with purchase.

Learn more about what you receive with purchase of this case.

Mejia v. Harrington

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA


September 20, 2010

JOSHUA MICHAEL MEJIA, PETITIONER,
v.
HARRINGTON, RESPONDENT.

The opinion of the court was delivered by: Sandra M. Snyder United States Magistrate Judge

ORDER DISREGARDING PETITIONER'S OTIONS FOR EXTENSIONS OF TIME TO FILE TRAVERSE AS MOOT [Docs. 33, 34, 35, 38, 39]

Petitioner is a state prisoner proceeding pro se with a petition for writ of habeas corpus pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 2254. Pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 636(c)(1), the parties have consented to the jurisdiction of the United States Magistrate Judge. Local Rule 305(b).

Petitioner has filed several motions for extensions of time to file a traverse to Respondent's answer. Inasmuch as Petitioner filed his traverse on September 14, 2010, all the pending motions for extensions of time are HEREBY DISREGARDED as MOOT.

IT IS SO ORDERED.

20100920

© 1992-2010 VersusLaw Inc.



Buy This Entire Record For $7.95

Official citation and/or docket number and footnotes (if any) for this case available with purchase.

Learn more about what you receive with purchase of this case.