Searching over 5,500,000 cases.


searching
Buy This Entire Record For $7.95

Official citation and/or docket number and footnotes (if any) for this case available with purchase.

Learn more about what you receive with purchase of this case.

Vann v. Hernandez

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA


September 20, 2010

OLIVER VANN, PLAINTIFF,
v.
D. HERNANDEZ, ET AL., DEFENDANTS.

The opinion of the court was delivered by: Sandra M. Snyder United States Magistrate Judge

ORDER REQUIRING PLAINTIFF TO FILE OPPOSITION OR STATEMENT OF NON-OPPOSITION TO DEFENDANTS' MOTION FOR SUMMARY JUDGMENT WITHIN THIRTY DAYS

On June 25, 2010, Plaintiff was ordered to file a response to Defendants' motion for summary judgment within thirty days. Local Rule 230(l). To date, Plaintiff has not complied with the order.

The first informational order and the second informational order were not issued in this case. For that reason, the orders will now be issued. Klingele v. Eikenberry, 849 F.2d 409, 411-12 (9th Cir. 1988) (notice to pro se litigants of requirements for opposing summary judgment notice is required). Plaintiff is granted an additional thirty days to file his opposition or statement of non-opposition to Defendants' motion. If Plaintiff fails to file an opposition or a statement of non-opposition within thirty days from the date of service of this order, this action will be dismissed, with prejudice, for failure to prosecute.

IT IS SO ORDERED.

20100920

© 1992-2010 VersusLaw Inc.



Buy This Entire Record For $7.95

Official citation and/or docket number and footnotes (if any) for this case available with purchase.

Learn more about what you receive with purchase of this case.