Searching over 5,500,000 cases.


searching
Buy This Entire Record For $7.95

Official citation and/or docket number and footnotes (if any) for this case available with purchase.

Learn more about what you receive with purchase of this case.

Rhoden v. Mayberg

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA FRESNO DIVISION


September 21, 2010

LAWTIS DONALD RHODEN, PLAINTIFF,
v.
STEPHEN W. MAYBERG, BEN MCCLAIN, GEORGE MAYNARD, NORM KRAMER, CYNTHIA A. RADAVSKY, AND PAM AHLIN, DEFENDANTS.

The opinion of the court was delivered by: B. Lynn Winmill Chief Judge United States District Court

ORDER

Pending before the Court are a Report and Recommendation issued by the United States Magistrate Judge and several motions filed by Plaintiff. Having reviewed the record, the Court enters the following Order.

ORDER

IT IS HEREBY ORDERED:

1. Plaintiff'S Motion that the Court Not to Consolidate this Case (Dkt. 43) was GRANTED as a result of the Order of (Dkt. 44), and therefore it is MOOT.

2. Plaintiff's Motion Requesting a Second Informational Order (Dkt. 45) is DENIED. Plaintiff is directed to file a response to the portion of the Report and Recommendation recommending that Defendants' Motion to Dismiss be granted if he wishes to avoid dismissal of his case. Plaintiff shall have until September 29, 2010, in which to file any objection to the pending Report and Recommendation. Failure to do so will result in dismissal of Plaintiff's case on the grounds recommended by the United States Magistrate Judge.

3. Plaintiff's Motion for Expedited Ruling on Defendants' Motion to Dismiss (Dkt. 46) is GRANTED to the extent that the Report and Recommendation has been issued.

20100921

© 1992-2010 VersusLaw Inc.



Buy This Entire Record For $7.95

Official citation and/or docket number and footnotes (if any) for this case available with purchase.

Learn more about what you receive with purchase of this case.