UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
September 24, 2010
GUADALUPE BRAVO-MENDOZA, PETITIONER,
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, RESPONDENT.
The opinion of the court was delivered by: Hayes, Judge
On May 6, 2010, Petitioner filed a Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 2241. (ECF No. 1) On August 27, 2010, Petitioner filed supplemental documents. (ECF No. 10). Petitioner challenges his convictions in 1987 and 1989 due to corruption by the police, the government, the court, and his attorney. (ECF No. 1 at 2-3). He also asserts he is a United States citizen by birth. Id. at 3. In the Petition, Bravo contends he is being held at the Santa Ana Jail. (ECF. No. 1 at 1). In the supplemental documents, Petitioner states that his address is "422 S. Birch St., Apt. 200, Santa Ana, CA 92701." (ECF No. 10 at 1).
This Court may entertain a petition for writ of habeas corpus from a person "in custody in violation of the Constitution or laws or treaties of the United States." 28 U.S.C. § 2241(c)(3). A habeas corpus petition challenges "the very fact or duration of his physical imprisonment, and the relief [a petitioner may seek] is a determination that he is entitled to immediate release or a speedier release from that imprisonment." Preiser v. Rodriguez, 411 U.S. 475, 500 (1973). The Court shall "award the writ or issue an order directing the respondent to show cause why the writ should not be granted, unless it appears from the application that the applicant or person detained is not entitled thereto." 28 U.S.C. § 2243.
Petitioner does not allege that he is in custody "in violation of the Constitution or laws or treaties of the United States." See 28 U.S.C. § 2241(c)(3). The Court concludes that summary dismissal is warranted at this time.
IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that the Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 2241 is DISMISSED. (ECF No. 1).
WILLIAM Q. HAYES United States District Judge
© 1992-2010 VersusLaw Inc.