Searching over 5,500,000 cases.


searching
Buy This Entire Record For $7.95

Official citation and/or docket number and footnotes (if any) for this case available with purchase.

Learn more about what you receive with purchase of this case.

Laws v. Sisto

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA


September 24, 2010

ALFRED LAWS, PETITIONER,
v.
D. K. SISTO, WARDEN, RESPONDENT.

The opinion of the court was delivered by: Garland E. Burrell, Jr. United States District Judge

ORDER

Petitioner, a state prisoner proceeding pro se, has filed this application for a writ of habeas corpus pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 2254. The matter was referred to a United States Magistrate Judge pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1)(B) and Local Rule 302. On March 31, 2010, the magistrate judge filed findings and recommendations recommending that the case be dismissed. On May 27, 2010, the undersigned adopted the findings and recommendations, dismissed the case, and declined to issue a certificate of appealability.

On June 14, 2010, petitioner filed a motion for a certificate of appealability. On June 21, 2010, petitioner requested an extension of time to file a notice of appeal. On July 15, 2010, the magistrate judge granted him 30 days to file a notice of appeal. However, petitioner did not file a notice of appeal. Accordingly, his motion for a certificate of appealability must be denied as moot.

It is hereby ORDERED that petitioner's July 14, 2010 motion for a certificate of appealability is denied.

20100924

© 1992-2010 VersusLaw Inc.



Buy This Entire Record For $7.95

Official citation and/or docket number and footnotes (if any) for this case available with purchase.

Learn more about what you receive with purchase of this case.