The opinion of the court was delivered by: Manuel L. Real United States District Judge
FINDINGS OF FACT AND CONCLUSIONS OF LAW
1. Plaintiff Ramiro Garcia's Complaint for Damages filed on August 20, 2009, alleges that it is an action for deprivation of civil rights under color of law pursuant to Title 42 U.S.C. § 1983. Plaintiff sues Sergeant DeFrancesco under section 1983 for false arrest under the Fourth and Fourteenth Amendments, and sues both DeFrancesco and The Regents of the University of California for negligence pursuant to Government Code section 815.2(a).
2. Plaintiff's driver's license lists him as Ramiro Garcia. Plaintiff's date of birth is March 11, 1962.
3. In January 2008, plaintiff applied at the University of California Los Angeles ("UCLA") for employment as a flooring worker.
4. On February 8, 2008, Sergeant DeFrancesco received a phone call from Investigator Shelby Wright with the Charlotte County Sheriff's office in Punta Gorda, Florida. Wright advised that they had reason to believe that their felony suspect Ramiro Garcia (DOB 3-11-1962) was employed or about to be employed at UCLA.
5. Wright stated that Garcia was wanted in Florida on a $50,000 warrant for Aggravated Battery with a Deadly Weapon. Wright told Sergeant DeFrancesco that they would extradite Garcia from California, and he provided a teletype requesting extradition along with information showing details of an arrest warrant.
6. To follow up on the information Sergeant DeFrancesco had received from Investigator Wright, he confirmed with the UCLA Facilities Management Department that plaintiff Ramiro Garcia had applied for employment as a flooring installer.
7. Plaintiff had the same name, Ramiro Garcia, as indicated on the arrest warrant. He also had the same date of birth, March 11, 1962, and the same race, gender, hair and eye color. The height and weight indicated on the warrant (approximately 5'9" and 187 pounds) were similar but not identical to plaintiff's DMV information (5'6" and 160 pounds).
8. Sergeant DeFrancesco did not have a photograph or fingerprint from the Florida authorities to use for comparison with plaintiff; however, he was informed and believed based on the phone call from Florida officials that the subject of their warrant had applied for work with UCLA
9. After Sergeant DeFrancesco called Facilities Management at UCLA, they agreed to work with the UCLA Police department in order to effect the arrest. As a result, Sergeant DeFrancesco was informed and believed that Facilities Management staff telephoned plaintiff and requested that he respond to the UCLA campus to begin work on February 11, 2008, at 2:30 p.m., at the job site, which was an occupied building at 601 Westwood Plaza.
10. At about 2:00 p.m. or so on February 11, 2008, plaintiff arrived at the Facilities office at UCLA, and he was escorted to the old building where the police station had been.
11. Inside the building, Officers Behrens and Pak were in full uniform in a room adjacent to the front entrance. In a second adjacent room, Detectives Arsena and Gentilucci were present as backup. When plaintiff entered the building through the front lobby, Sergeant DeFrancesco recognized him from a California DMV photo he had pulled.
12. As plaintiff entered the hallway, Officers Behrens and Pak exited the room nearby and conducted a felony stop on him. Officer Pak instructed plaintiff to put his hands on his head, kneel on the ground, and then lay face down on the ground. Plaintiff complied with these requests, and Officer Pak then handcuffed plaintiff and took him into custody without incident.
13. The officers helped plaintiff up from the floor and Officer Pak transported plaintiff to the UCLA police department for booking. Officer Pak booked plaintiff as a felony ...