Searching over 5,500,000 cases.


searching
Buy This Entire Record For $7.95

Official citation and/or docket number and footnotes (if any) for this case available with purchase.

Learn more about what you receive with purchase of this case.

Baez v. Sisto

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA


September 27, 2010

ANTHONY BAEZ, PETITIONER,
v.
D.K. SISTO, RESPONDENT.

ORDER

Petitioner is a California prisoner proceeding pro se with an application for writ of habeas corpus under 28 U.S.C. § 2254. Petitioner challenges the fact that he was denied parole. In the decision to deny petitioner parole, the parole hearing panel relies upon psychological evaluations concerning petitioner. One was drafted in 1999 and the other was drafted in 2003. See Pet., Ex. B at 55-56. The evaluations are not before the court and the court requires them to issue findings and recommendations concerning petitioner's habeas application. Therefore,

IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that, within twenty-one days, respondent file with the court the 1999 and 2003 psychological evaluations referenced in the 2006 decision denying petitioner parole. See Rule 5, Fed. R. Governing § 2254 Cases.

20100927

© 1992-2010 VersusLaw Inc.



Buy This Entire Record For $7.95

Official citation and/or docket number and footnotes (if any) for this case available with purchase.

Learn more about what you receive with purchase of this case.