IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
September 27, 2010
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, PLAINTIFF,
JOSE MARIA GUTIERREZ, ET.AL. DEFENDANT.
The opinion of the court was delivered by: Hon. John A. Mendez U.S. District Judge
STIPULATION AND ORDER TO EXCLUDE TIME
The parties request that the status conference in this case be continued from September 28, 2010 to November 2, 2010 at 9:30 a.m. They stipulate that the time between September 28, 2010 and November 2, 2010 should be excluded from the calculation of time under the Speedy Trial Act. The parties stipulate that the ends of justice are served by the Court excluding such time, so that counsel for the defendant may have reasonable time necessary for effective preparation, taking into account the exercise of due diligence. 18 U.S.C. § 3161(h)(7)(B)(iv) and Local Code T-4. Specifically, defense counsel need additional time to review discovery and investigate the case. The parties stipulate and agree that the interests of justice served by granting this continuance outweigh the best interests of the public and the defendant in a speedy trial. 18 U.S.C. § 3161(h)(7)(A).
© 1992-2010 VersusLaw Inc.