Searching over 5,500,000 cases.


searching
Buy This Entire Record For $7.95

Official citation and/or docket number and footnotes (if any) for this case available with purchase.

Learn more about what you receive with purchase of this case.

Tyco Healthcare Group LP v. Biolitec

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA SAN FRANCISCO DIVISION


September 28, 2010

TYCO HEALTHCARE GROUP LP D/B/A VNUS MEDICAL TECHNOLOGIES, PLAINTIFF,
v.
BIOLITEC, INC. AND NEW STAR LASERS, INC. D/B/A COOLTOUCH, INC., DEFENDANTS.
TYCO HEALTHCARE GROUP LP D/B/A VNUS MEDICAL TECHNOLOGIES, PLAINTIFF,
v.
TOTAL VEIN SOLUTIONS, LLC D/B/A TOTAL VEIN SYSTEMS, DEFENDANT.

The opinion of the court was delivered by: Hon. Maxine M. Chesney United States District Judge

[PROPOSED] ORDER GRANTING IN PART AND DENYING IN PART PLAINTIFF'S MOTION FOR ADMINISTRATIVE RELIEF TO FILE DOCUMENTS UNDER SEAL [CIVIL LOCAL RULES 7-11, 79-5]

Before the Court is the Plaintiff's Motion for Administrative Relief to File Documents Under Seal dated September 7, 2010, by which Plaintiff seeks leave to file under seal unredacted versions of certain documents submitted in support of Plaintiff's Opposition to Defendants' Motion in Limine No. 1 and Omnibus Opposition and Response to Defendants' Motions in Limine Nos. 2-7 ("VNUS's Opposition Briefs"). Having reviewed the parties' submissions filed in support of the motion, the Court rules as follows:

1. The motion is GRANTED as to the following documents that the parties have shown contain material properly filed under seal, each of which the requesting party is directed to ("If a motion to file under seal is granted in full or in part, the requesting party will e-file the document according to the procedure outlined in the FAQs on the ECF website."):

file under seal, no later than five calendar days from the date of this order. See General Order 62 October 4, 2010

x The entirety of Exhibits 34 and 35 and designated portions of Exhibits 5 (page 63), 14 (page 34), 18 (Ex. A, pages 5-6), 20 (page 2), 26 (pages 13, 40-42, 45), 28 (pages 4-7), 30 (pages 195-96, 199-200), and 31 (pages 2-3, 5, 10, 12-15, 20) to the Declaration of Diem-Suong T. Nguyen in Support of VNUS's Opposition Briefs which contain information that has been designated by VNUS.

Designated portions of Exhibit 26 (pages 45-46)

x The entirety of Exhibits 1, 3, 9, 13, 22, 26, 29, 30, 32, 33, 38, and 39 and designated portions of Exhibits 4 (pages 73, 95), 5 (pages 56, 64), 14 (page 39), and 28 (pages 2, 3) to the Declaration of Diem-Suong T. Nguyen in Support of VNUS's Opposition Briefs which contain information that has been designated by the Defendants. defendant Total Vein Solutions, LLC.

x Designated portions of VNUS's Opposition Briefs, dated September 7, 2010. , specifically, those portions in which the content of the above-referenced exhibits or portions thereof are discussed.

2. The motion is DENIED as to Exhibits 1, 3, 4 (pages 73, 95), 5 (pages 56, 64), 9, 13, 14 (page 39), 22, 28 (pages 2-3), 29, 30 (pages 101-102, 104, 217-219, 260-262), 32, 33, 38, and 39 to the Declaration of Diem-Suong T. Nguyen, for the reason that no party has filed a declaration 2010.

IT IS SO ORDERED.

20100928

© 1992-2010 VersusLaw Inc.



Buy This Entire Record For $7.95

Official citation and/or docket number and footnotes (if any) for this case available with purchase.

Learn more about what you receive with purchase of this case.