Searching over 5,500,000 cases.


searching
Buy This Entire Record For $7.95

Official citation and/or docket number and footnotes (if any) for this case available with purchase.

Learn more about what you receive with purchase of this case.

Hollis v. Sloan

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA


September 30, 2010

MARVIN GLENN HOLLIS, PLAINTIFF,
v.
PHILLIP SLOAN, ET AL., DEFENDANTS.

The opinion of the court was delivered by: Garland E. Burrell, Jr. United States District Judge

ORDER

Plaintiff, a state prisoner proceeding pro se, has filed this civil rights action seeking relief under 42 U.S.C. § 1983. The matter was referred to a United States Magistrate Judge pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1)(B) and Local Rule 302.

On July 28, 2010, the magistrate judge filed findings and recommendations herein which were served on all parties and which contained notice to all parties that any objections to the findings and recommendations were to be filed within twenty-one days. Neither party has filed objections to the findings and recommendations.

The court has reviewed the file and finds the findings and recommendations to be supported by the record and by the magistrate judge's analysis.

Accordingly, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that:

1. The findings and recommendations filed July 28, 2010 (Dkt. No. 47) are adopted in full;

2. Defendants' September 23, 2009 motion to dismiss (Dkt. No. 37) is partially granted;

3. Defendants' motion to dismiss plaintiff's Eighth Amendment claims for injunctive relief, and request to appoint a receiver, is granted;

4. Defendants' motion to dismiss plaintiff's Eighth Amendment claims for damages is denied;

5. Defendants' motion to dismiss defendants Cummings and Acquaviva is denied;

6. Plaintiff's claim for injunctive relief against defendants at High Desert State Prison, based on his retaliation claims, is denied; and

7. This action shall proceed on plaintiff's Eighth Amendment claims for damages, including his claim for damages based on the alleged breach of mental health confidentiality, and plaintiff's retaliation claims, as set forth in the July 28, 2010 findings and recommendations.

20100930

© 1992-2010 VersusLaw Inc.



Buy This Entire Record For $7.95

Official citation and/or docket number and footnotes (if any) for this case available with purchase.

Learn more about what you receive with purchase of this case.