UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT CENTRAL DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
October 1, 2010
The opinion of the court was delivered by: Honorable Cormac J. Carney, United States District Judge
CIVIL MINUTES -- GENERAL
PROCEEDINGS: (IN CHAMBERS)
ORDER REMANDING CASE TO STATE COURT [filed 08/11/10]
Cross-complainant Peter Szanto, acting pro se, removed this action from state court on August 11, 2010. Mr. Szanto seemed to base his removal on the fact that the cross-defendant in state court, Robert Lewin, is in bankruptcy. Because it was not clear from Mr. Szanto's removal papers whether this Court has subject-matter jurisdiction, the Court issued an order to Mr. Szanto to show cause as to why this case should not be dismissed for lack of subject matter jurisdiction or stayed pending resolution of the bankruptcy proceeding. Mr. Szanto has failed to respond to this Court's order.
A district court must remand a case to state court if it appears at any time before final judgment that the district court lacks subject matter jurisdiction. 28 U.S.C. §1447(c). Mr. Szanto has not provided any basis for federal question or diversity jurisdiction. 28 U.S.C. §§ 1331, 1332. Therefore, this case is hereby REMANDED to state court.
MINUTES FORM 11
© 1992-2010 VersusLaw Inc.