Searching over 5,500,000 cases.


searching
Buy This Entire Record For $7.95

Official citation and/or docket number and footnotes (if any) for this case available with purchase.

Learn more about what you receive with purchase of this case.

Curtis v. City of Oakland

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA


October 5, 2010

RONALD EL-MALIK CURTIS, PLAINTIFF,
v.
CITY OF OAKLAND, JENNIFER RAY, IN HER INDIVIDUAL CAPACITY, JOSEPH TORRES, IN HIS INDIVIDUAL CAPACITY, JOHN FARRELL, IN HIS INDIVIDUAL CAPACITY, AND GERALD A. SIMON, CHIEF, IN HIS OFFICIAL AND INDIVIDUAL CAPACITIES, AND DOES 1 THROUGH 15, DEFENDANTS.

The opinion of the court was delivered by: Hon. Susan Illston United States District Court

STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED] ORDER TO FILE PLAINTIFF'S SECOND AMENDED COMPLAINT

The parties, by and through their respective counsel of record, agree that Plaintiff RONALD EL-MALIK CURTIS may file a Second Amended Complaint and Defendants will not oppose the filing. Therefore, a Motion for Leave to Amend is not required. Good cause exists as this stipulation promotes judicial efficiency. This stipulation is without prejudice to Defendants' right to file a Motion to Dismiss under Federal Rules of Civil Procedure, Rule 12(b)(6).

Dated: September 24, 2010 PRICE AND ASSOCIATES PAMELA Y. PRICE, Attorneys for Plaintiff Dated: September 24, 2010 FOSTER EMPLOYMENT LAW Madelyn J ordan-Davis MADEYLN JORDAN-DAVIS, Attorneys for Defendants

ORDER

Pursuant to the foregoing stipulation of the parties and good cause appearing therefore, IT IS SO ORDERED.

20101005

© 1992-2010 VersusLaw Inc.



Buy This Entire Record For $7.95

Official citation and/or docket number and footnotes (if any) for this case available with purchase.

Learn more about what you receive with purchase of this case.