Searching over 5,500,000 cases.


searching
Buy This Entire Record For $7.95

Official citation and/or docket number and footnotes (if any) for this case available with purchase.

Learn more about what you receive with purchase of this case.

United States v. Steadfast Insurance Co.

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA SAN FRANCISCO DIVISION


October 8, 2010

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, PLAINTIFF,
v.
STEADFAST INSURANCE COMPANY, DEFENDANT.

The opinion of the court was delivered by: Hon. Elizabeth D. Laporte United States Magistrate Judge

STIPULATION REGARDING LIMITED REOPENING OF DISCOVERY TO ALLOW ZURICH INSURANCE COMPANY, ZURICH, DEFENDANTS TO SUBPOENA AMERICAN INSURANCE COMPANY and DOCUMENTS FROM UC BERKELEY

At a meet and confer discussion held in accordance with the Court's instructions, the parties have agreed and hereby stipulate as follows:

Defendants filed a motion to compel certain depositions arising from the recent production of a document, after the September 10, 2010 discovery cut-off, by The Presidio Trust.

At plaintiff's request, defendants withdrew the motion to allow for further meet and confer discussion. Defendants have agreed to withdraw the motion without prejudice until after having reviewed documents produced pursuant to the subpoenas and further meet and confer as to which depositions may be appropriate. Accordingly, discovery may be re-opened to permit the subpoena of documents from U.C. Berkeley, per the three subpoenas issued by defendants' counsel on September 24, 2010, requesting depositions and production of documents on October 15, 2010. The three subpoenas were directed to U.C. Berkeley, as well as U.C. Berkeley employees Roger Byrne and Liam Reidy. The documents may be produced forthwith. At present, it is contemplated that the documents sought by the subpoenas will be produced no later than October 8, 2010. Based on this meeting today, Plaintiff and Defendants hereby agree that Defendants shall have until October 15, 2010 to move to compel the depositions as described above.

IT IS SO STIPULATED.

PURSUANT TO STIPULATION, IT IS SO ORDERED.

20101008

© 1992-2010 VersusLaw Inc.



Buy This Entire Record For $7.95

Official citation and/or docket number and footnotes (if any) for this case available with purchase.

Learn more about what you receive with purchase of this case.