Searching over 5,500,000 cases.


searching
Buy This Entire Record For $7.95

Official citation and/or docket number and footnotes (if any) for this case available with purchase.

Learn more about what you receive with purchase of this case.

Wade v. Fresno Police Dep't

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA


October 9, 2010

DEON WADE, PLAINTIFF,
v.
FRESNO POLICE DEPARTMENT, ET AL., DEFENDANTS.

The opinion of the court was delivered by: Dennis L. Beck United States Magistrate Judge

ORDER REGARDING MOTION: REQUEST TO BE PRESENT AT DEPOSITION

(Doc. 49)

On October 4, 2010, Plaintiff Deon Wade ("Plaintiff"), a state prisoner proceeding pro se and in forma pauperis, filed a motion seeking leave of court to be present at the deposition of Shamika Jackson. Plaintiff's motion was entered on the Court's docket on October 5, 2010. (Doc. 49.) Although the time for Defendants to respond to the motion has not expired, they will not be prejudiced by this Order because there is no merit to Plaintiff's motion.

According to Plaintiff, Shamika Jackson's deposition was set for October 6, 2010, at 1:30 p.m. at the Fresno City Attorney's Office located in Fresno, California. As a practical matter, the time set for the deposition has passed. Thus, Plaintiff's request to attend the deposition is DENIED as moot.

Plaintiff also requests to be present at the deposition of Lamont White "should he become available." (Doc. 49.) The Court finds it unnecessary to address Plaintiff's request because it is premature and no deposition has been scheduled.

IT IS SO ORDERED.

20101009

© 1992-2010 VersusLaw Inc.



Buy This Entire Record For $7.95

Official citation and/or docket number and footnotes (if any) for this case available with purchase.

Learn more about what you receive with purchase of this case.