Searching over 5,500,000 cases.


searching
Buy This Entire Record For $7.95

Official citation and/or docket number and footnotes (if any) for this case available with purchase.

Learn more about what you receive with purchase of this case.

Fargo v. Shree Balaji Hospitality

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA


October 12, 2010

WELLS FARGO, NATIONAL ASSOCIATION, SUCCESSOR IN INTEREST BY CONSOLIDATION TO PLACER SIERRA BANK, PLAINTIFF,
v.
SHREE BALAJI HOSPITALITY, LP, A CALIFORNIA LIMITED PARTNERSHIP; BALWANTSINH DOLATSINHM THAKOR, AN INDIVIDUAL; LABATEN BALWANTSINH THAKOR, AN INDIVIDUAL; EDF RESOURCE CAPITAL,INC.; U.S. SMALL BUSINESS ADMINISTRATION; CITY OF OAKDALE AND DOES 1 THROUGH 50, INCLUSIVE DEFENDANTS.

ORDER GRANTING DEFENDANT EDF RESOURCE CAPITAL, INC.'S MOTION TO DISMISS (Doc. No. 20)

Currently pending before the Court is defendant EDF Resource Capital, Inc.'s ("EDF") motion to dismiss plaintiff Wells Fargo, National Association's ("Wells Fargo") Complaint against it. For the reasons that follow, EDF's motion to dismiss is granted.

HISTORY*fn1

On June 8, 2010, Wells Fargo filed a Complaint in the Stanislaus County Superior Court seeking to enforce a loan agreement and foreclosure on a first Deed of Trust that secures a loan made to defendant Shree Balaji Hospitality, LP ("Shree"). Shree used the loan to finance the purchase of a motel ("Property"). Shree defaulted on the loan. Wells Fargo alleges that defendants EDF and U.S. Small Business Administration ("SBA") are junior lien holders and/or fractional owners of the subject property and are named "for notice and informational purposes only." See Complaint ¶¶6;42. SBA removed the action to this Court. On June 9, 2010, Byron Chapman was appointed receiver and was thereafter confirmed by this Court on July 29, 2010. On August 11, 2010, EDF filed a motion to dismiss. On September 10, 2010, Wells Fargo filed an opposition.

ANALYSIS

EDF's Argument

EDF moves to dismiss the Complaint on the grounds that it assigned its beneficial interest in the Deed of Trust to SBA on May 3, 2007. Wells Fargo concedes that EDF assigned and transferred all of its beneficial interest in the Deed of Trust to SBA. See Wells Fargo Opposition at page 2.*fn2

Wells Fargo's Argument

Wells Fargo argues that despite the assignment, "it is reluctant to voluntarily dismiss EDF on the basis of a loan loss risk provision it shares with SBA." Wells Fargo argues that under the "loan loss risk" provision, EDF could suffer a financial loss, in the event that SBA loses its security interest as a junior lien holder if a foreclosure decree is issued. Id.

Resolution

EDF is representing to the Court that it has no interest in the foreclosure of the Property. EDF asserts that: "The evidence presented by [EDF] irrefutably demonstrates that [EDF] has no financial or beneficial interest in the deed of trust for the commercial real property because [EDF] assigned all of its right and interests in the Deed of Trust to the SBA." See EDF Motion to Dismiss at page 2. Based on EDF's representations, it appears that EDF should be dismissed from this case. EDF is representing that: (1) it will have no lien that survives this action for judicial foreclosure and is not entitled to money damages against Wells Fargo in connection with the foreclosure; and (2) it will have no recourse against Wells Fargo for any loss related to the judicial foreclosure, including any loss under the "loss risk provision" that Wells Fargo references in its opposition.*fn3 Based on EDF's representations, the Court will grant EDF's motion to dismiss.

ORDER

Accordingly, EDF's motion to dismiss is GRANTED.

IT IS SO ORDERED.


Buy This Entire Record For $7.95

Official citation and/or docket number and footnotes (if any) for this case available with purchase.

Learn more about what you receive with purchase of this case.