The opinion of the court was delivered by: Hon. Charles R. Breyer U.S. District Judge
STIPULATIONTOENLARGE PAGELIMITATION FOR PLAINTIFFS' REPLY MEMORANDUM OF LAW IN SUPPORT OF MOTION FOR CONDITIONAL COLLECTIVE ACTION CERTIFICATION AND ISSUANCE OF NOTICE TO THE COLLECTIVE ACTION CLASS
Counsel for Plaintiffs Joe Lewis Luque, Herman Richardson, and the Plaintiff Class:
Richardson, the Plaintiff class and Defendants AT&T Corp., Pacific Bell Telephone Company, and AT&T Communications of California, Inc., acting through their respective counsel of record, hereby stipulate as follows:
Action Certification and Issuance of Notice to the Collective Action Class is due October 15, 2010.
2. Due the volume of evidence in the AT&T Defendants' opposition to Plaintiffs' motion, Plaintiffs have requested that they be allowed to file a memorandum in support of their motion that is 30 pages long (i.e. 5 pages longer than the parties' previous so-ordered stipulation, filed prior to filing of defendants' opposition).
3. Defendants have agreed to this extension.
4. Based on the foregoing, the parties believe there is good cause for the Court to enlarge the page limitations for Plaintiffs' Reply Memorandum in support of their Motion for Conditional Collective Action Certification and Issuance of Notice to the Collective Action Class.
Pursuant to this Court's Local Rule 7-4(b), Plaintiffs Joe Lewis Luque, Herman
1. Plaintiffs' Reply Memorandum in support of their Motion for Conditional Collective
PURSUANT TO STIPULATION, IT IS SO ORDERED, this 14 day of October 2010.
© 1992-2010 VersusLaw ...