Searching over 5,500,000 cases.


searching
Buy This Entire Record For $7.95

Download the entire decision to receive the complete text, official citation,
docket number, dissents and concurrences, and footnotes for this case.

Learn more about what you receive with purchase of this case.

King v. Beregovskaya

October 14, 2010

ANTHONY L. KING, PLAINTIFF,
v.
OLGA BEREGOVSKAYA, ET AL., DEFENDANTS.



ORDER RE REQUEST FOR COURT TO SCREEN PLAINTIFF'S COMPLAINT AND GRANT THIRTY DAYS FOR DEFENDANT TO FILE A RESPONSIVE PLEADING (Doc.10)

Plaintiff Anthony L. King ("Plaintiff") is a state prisoner proceeding pro se in this civil rights action pursuant to 42 U.S.C. § 1983. Defendants removed this action, which was filed in Kings County Superior Court, on July 10, 2009. (Doc. 1.) Plaintiff's request for remand was denied March 22, 2010. (Doc. 8.) On October 13, 2010, Defendants filed a request seeking to have the complaint screened and be allowed thirty-days to respond to the complaint, to commence upon issuance of the screening order. (Doc. 10.)

The Court is required to screen complaints brought by prisoners seeking relief against a governmental entity or officer or employee of a governmental entity. 28 U.S.C. § 1915A(a). This action is currently set for screening, but due to the backlog of prisoner cases will not be screened immediately. The Court will grant Defendant's request that they be relieved from the obligation to file a responsive pleading until 30 days after the complaint is screened.

Defendants' request is HEREBY GRANTED IN PART, and Defendants shall have thirty (30) days to file a response to the complaint, to commence upon issuance of the screening order.

IT IS SO ORDERED.

20101014

© 1992-2010 VersusLaw ...

Buy This Entire Record For $7.95

Download the entire decision to receive the complete text, official citation,
docket number, dissents and concurrences, and footnotes for this case.

Learn more about what you receive with purchase of this case.