The opinion of the court was delivered by: Honorable VIRGINIA A. Phillips United States District Judge
JUDGMENT AND PROBATION/COMMITMENT ORDER
In the presence of the attorney for the government, the defendant appeared in person on this date. 10 04 2010
W WITH COUNSEL CARLOS JUAREZ, CJA, Appointed
GUILTY, and the court being satisfied that there is a factual basis for the plea.
NOLO CONTENDERE NOT GUILTY
There being a finding/verdict of GUILTY, defendant has been convicted as charged of the offense(s) of:
8 U.S.C. § 371, in Violation of Conspiracy to Make False Statements as Charged in Count One of the Indictment.
The Court asked whether there was any reason why judgment should not be pronounced. Because no sufficient cause to the contrary was shown, or appeared to the Court, the Court adjudged the defendant guilty as charged and convicted and ordered that: Pursuant to the Sentencing Reform Act of 1984, it is the judgment of the Court that the defendant is hereby committed to the custody of the Bureau of Prisons to be imprisoned for a term of:
It is ordered that the defendant shall pay to the United States a special assessment of $25, which is due
It is ordered that the defendant shall pay to the United States, a total fine of $2,500, with no interest ordered, as the defendant is unable to pay a fine and interest.
The fine shall be paid in monthly installments of $100, during the term of probation, beginning on March 15,
The defendant shall comply with General Order No. 01-05.
Pursuant to the Sentencing Reform Act of 1984, it is the judgment of the Court that the defendant, Eugene Van Houten, is hereby placed on probation on Count One of the First Superseding Information for a term of three years under the following terms and conditions:
The defendant shall comply with the rules and regulations of the U. S. Probation Office and General Order 05-02;
The defendant shall comply with General Order No. 01-05; and During the period of community supervision the defendant shall pay the special assessment and fine in accordance with this judgment's orders pertaining to such payment.
The drug testing condition mandated by statute is suspended based on the Court's determination that the defendant poses a ...