Searching over 5,500,000 cases.


searching
Buy This Entire Record For $7.95

Official citation and/or docket number and footnotes (if any) for this case available with purchase.

Learn more about what you receive with purchase of this case.

McNally v. Eye Dog Foundation for the Blind

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA -- FRESNO DIVISION


October 19, 2010

MCNALLY ET. AL., PLAINTIFFS,
v.
EYE DOG FOUNDATION FOR THE BLIND, INC., ET. AL., DEFENDANTS.

The opinion of the court was delivered by: Sheila K. Oberto United States Magistrate Judge

ORDER ON DEFENDANTS' "FIRST AMENDED SCHEDULING REPORT," "CROSS-CLAIM," AND "FIRST AMENDED CROSS-CLAIM" (Docket Nos. 78, 79, 80)

On October 13, 2010, the Court granted the request of Defendants Eye Dog Foundation for the Blind, Inc.,*fn1 Gwen Brown, and Eye Dog Foundation Profit Sharing Plan ("Defendants") to file a motion seeking leave of the Court to file an amended answer or a counterclaim by no later than October 18, 2010. (Doc. 76.)

On October 18, 2010, Defendants filed a document entitled "First Amended Scheduling Report." (Doc. 78.) This document, however, bears the caption "Defendants' Notice of Motion and Motion to Amend Scheduling Order to Allow the Filing of a Cross-Complaint; Supporting Memorandum of Points and Authorities." Defendants also filed a "CrossClaim" and a "First Amended CrossClaim" on that same day. (Docs. 79, 80.) Defendants have not received leave of Court to file an amended pleading; they have only received permission to present a motion to the Court seeking to file an amended pleading.

Accordingly, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED THAT:

1. The Clerk of the Court shall:

(a) STRIKE the documents filed at Docket Nos. 79 and 80 entitled "CROSS-CLAIM" and "FIRST AMENDED CROSS-CLAIM," respectively; and

(b) TERMINATE all CM/ECF references to a "Cross Defendant" or a "Cross Claimant" that has been added to the docket report as a result of Defendants' premature filing of Docket Nos. 79 and 80.

2. On or before October 20, 2010, Defendants shall:

(a) WITHDRAW their "First Amended Scheduling Report" at Docket No. 78;

(b) REFILE the document currently located at Docket No. 78 as a "MOTION" bearing a title that correlates to the caption on the document; and

(c) ATTACH the proposed "CROSS-CLAIM" as an EXHIBIT to the refiled MOTION. Unless and until the Court grants Defendants permission to file the CROSS-CLAIM, that document may not be filed as a separate pleading.

3. As set forth in the Court's Order of October 18, 2010, Plaintiffs shall file any opposition to Defendants' "Motion to Amend Scheduling Order to Allow the Filing of a Cross-Complaint" on or before October 28, 2010.

4. Defendants may file an optional reply to Plaintiffs' opposition on or before November 2, 2010.

IT IS SO ORDERED.


Buy This Entire Record For $7.95

Official citation and/or docket number and footnotes (if any) for this case available with purchase.

Learn more about what you receive with purchase of this case.