Searching over 5,500,000 cases.


searching
Buy This Entire Record For $7.95

Download the entire decision to receive the complete text, official citation,
docket number, dissents and concurrences, and footnotes for this case.

Learn more about what you receive with purchase of this case.

United States v. Diaz

October 20, 2010

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
v.
1) ADRIAN DIAZ SOCIAL SECURITY NO. 9 9 3 0 ADRIAN ANTHONY DIAZ, REID ANDERSON (LAST 4 DIGITS)



The opinion of the court was delivered by: Hon. David O. Carter, U. S. District Judge

JUDGMENT AND PROBATION/COMMITMENT ORDER

MONTH DAY YEAR

In the presence of the attorney for the government, the defendant appeared in person on this date. 10 20 2010

X WITH COUNSEL Ken Reed, appointed

(Name of Counsel)

X GUILTY, and the court being satisfied that there is a factual basis for the plea.

NOLO CONTENDERE NOT GUILTY

There being a finding/verdict of GUILTY, defendant has been convicted as charged of the offense(s) of: Wire Fraud in violation of 18 U.S.C. § 1343 as charged in the Single-Count Information.

The Court asked whether there was any reason why judgment should not be pronounced. Because no sufficient cause to the contrary was shown, or appeared to the Court, the Court adjudged the defendant guilty as charged and convicted and ordered that:

It is ordered that the defendant shall pay to the United States a special assessment of $100.00, which is due

It is ordered that the defendant shall pay restitution in the total amount of $386,000.00 pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § Defendant shall pay restitution in the amount ordered to victims as set forth in a separate victim list prepared by the Probation Office which this Court adopts and which reflects the Court's determination of the amount of restitution due to each victim. The victim list, which shall be forwarded to the fiscal section of the Clerk's Office by the Probation Office, shall remain confidential to protect the privacy interests of the victims.

The defendant shall make nominal monthly payments of at least $50 during the period of probation, which shall begin 30 days after the commencement of supervision. Nominal restitution payments are ordered as the court finds that the defendant's economic circumstances do not allow for either immediate or future payment

The defendant shall be held jointly and severally liable with convicted co-defendant Carrie Diaz and convicted coconspirator Danh Nguyen (Case No. SACR10-00049-DOC) for the full amount of restitution ordered in this judgment. The victim's recovery is limited to the amount of the victim's loss and the defendant's liability for restitution ceases if and when the victim receives full restitution.

Pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 3612(f)(3)(A), interest on the restitution ordered is waived because the defendant does not have the ability to pay interest. Payments may be subject to penalties for default and delinquency pursuant

The defendant shall comply with General Order No. 01-05.

All fines are waived as it is found that the defendant does not have the ability to pay a fine in addition to restitution and such sanction would place an undue burden on the defendant's dependants.

Pursuant to the Sentencing Reform Act of 1984, it is the judgment of the Court that the defendant, Adrian Diaz, is hereby placed on probation on the Single-Count Information for a term of three years under the following terms and conditions:

The defendant shall comply with the rules and regulations of the U.S. Probation Office and General Order 05-02;

The defendant shall refrain from any unlawful use of a controlled substance. The defendant shall submit to one drug test within 15 days of placement on probation and to at least two periodic drug tests thereafter, not to exceed eight tests per month, as directed by the Probation Officer;

The defendant shall participate in an outpatient substance abuse treatment and counseling program that includes urinalysis, breath, and/or sweat patch testing, as directed by the Probation Officer. The defendant shall abstain from using illicit drugs and alcohol and abusing prescription medications during the period of supervision;

During the course of supervision, the Probation Officer, with the agreement of the defendant and defense counsel, may place the defendant in a residential drug treatment program approved by the United States Probation Office for treatment of narcotic addiction or drug dependency, which may include counseling and testing to determine if the defendant has reverted to the use of drugs, and the defendant shall reside in the treatment program until discharged by the Program Director and Probation Officer;

As directed by the Probation Officer, the defendant shall pay all or part of the costs of treating the defendant's drug or alcohol dependency to the aftercare contractor during the period of community supervision, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. ยง 3672. The defendant shall ...


Buy This Entire Record For $7.95

Download the entire decision to receive the complete text, official citation,
docket number, dissents and concurrences, and footnotes for this case.

Learn more about what you receive with purchase of this case.