Searching over 5,500,000 cases.


searching
Buy This Entire Record For $7.95

Official citation and/or docket number and footnotes (if any) for this case available with purchase.

Learn more about what you receive with purchase of this case.

West v. Hartley

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA


October 20, 2010

DARRYL F. WEST, PETITIONER,
v.
JAMES D. HARTLEY, RESPONDENT.

The opinion of the court was delivered by: Craig M. Kellison United States Magistrate Judge

ORDER

Petitioner, a state prisoner proceeding pro se, brings this petition for a writ of habeas corpus pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 2254. Pursuant to the written consent of all parties, this case is before the undersigned as the presiding judge for all purposes, including entry of final judgment. See 28 U.S.C. § 636(c). Pending before the court is Respondent's request to consolidate this action with Petitioner's prior case, CIV S-07-1048 JLQ.

While Petitioner's prior case was pending, he filed the current petition. However, prior to the court screening Petitioner's current petition and ordering a response thereto, Petitioner's prior petition was denied and judgment entered. Consolidation of the two actions, therefore, is unavailable as the prior court case is closed and the court cannot consolidate an open case with a closed case. The court will address the merits of Petitioner's petition.

Respondent's request to consolidate cases is therefore denied, and a response to the petition is required. Respondent shall file a response to Petitioner's petition within 45 days from the date of service of this order.

IT IS SO ORDERED.

20101020

© 1992-2010 VersusLaw Inc.



Buy This Entire Record For $7.95

Official citation and/or docket number and footnotes (if any) for this case available with purchase.

Learn more about what you receive with purchase of this case.