Searching over 5,500,000 cases.


searching
Buy This Entire Record For $7.95

Official citation and/or docket number and footnotes (if any) for this case available with purchase.

Learn more about what you receive with purchase of this case.

Rosenfeld v. JPmorgan Chase Bank

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT Northern District of California


October 22, 2010

PAUL E. ROSENFELD, PLAINTIFF,
v.
JPMORGAN CHASE BANK, N.A., ET AL., DEFENDANTS.

The opinion of the court was delivered by: Maria-Elena James Chief United States Magistrate Judge

ORDER SCHEDULING CASE 9 MANAGEMENT CONFERENCE

On August 9, 2010, the Court dismissed Plaintiff's First Amended Complaint, with the been properly served, the Court warned Plaintiff that he must ensure that any amended complaint of Fiduciary Duty, but solely as to Defendant Capital Market Funding, Inc., which has not appeared in this matter and did not join in the other named Defendants' motion to dismiss. (Dkt. #18.) However, as there is no indication that CMF has exception of his sixth cause of action for Breach that includes CMF as a defendant is properly served on it. On September 8, 2010, Plaintiff filed a Second Amended Complaint, with a sole cause of action against CMF for Breach of Fiduciary Duty. (Dkt. #20.) Accordingly, the Court shall conduct a case management conference on December 9, 2010 at 10:00 a.m. in Courtroom B. All dates in the December 30, 2009 scheduling order, (Dkt. #2), shall be adjusted accordingly.

IT IS SO ORDERED.

20101022

© 1992-2010 VersusLaw Inc.



Buy This Entire Record For $7.95

Official citation and/or docket number and footnotes (if any) for this case available with purchase.

Learn more about what you receive with purchase of this case.