Searching over 5,500,000 cases.


searching
Buy This Entire Record For $7.95

Official citation and/or docket number and footnotes (if any) for this case available with purchase.

Learn more about what you receive with purchase of this case.

Mullicane v. Lopez

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT CENTRAL DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA


October 22, 2010

MICHAEL STEWART MULLICANE, PETITIONER,
v.
RAUL LOPEZ, WARDEN, RESPONDENT.

The opinion of the court was delivered by: Hon. Otis D. Wright II United States District Judge

ORDER ADOPTING REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION OF UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE AND DENYING CERTIFICATE OF APPEALABILITY

Pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 636, the Court has reviewed the First Amended Petition ("Petition"), the Magistrate Judge's Report and Recommendation, Petitioner's objections to the Report and Recommendation, and the remaining record, and has made a de novo determination.

Petitioner's objections generally parrot and rehash the arguments made in the combined 520-page Petition and Traverse, and lack merit for the reasons set forth in the detailed Report and Recommendation.

Accordingly, IT IS ORDERED THAT: (1) the Report and Recommendation is approved and adopted; (2) Judgment be entered denying the Petition and dismissing this action with prejudice; and (3) the Clerk serve copies of this Order and the Judgment on the parties.

Additionally, for the reasons stated in the Report and Recommendation, the Court finds that Petitioner has not made a substantial showing of the denial of a constitutional right. See 28 U.S.C. § 2253; Fed. R. App. P. 22(b); Miller-El v. Cockrell, 537 U.S. 322, 336 (2003). Thus, the Court declines to issue a certificate of appealability.

20101022

© 1992-2010 VersusLaw Inc.



Buy This Entire Record For $7.95

Official citation and/or docket number and footnotes (if any) for this case available with purchase.

Learn more about what you receive with purchase of this case.