Searching over 5,500,000 cases.


searching
Buy This Entire Record For $7.95

Download the entire decision to receive the complete text, official citation,
docket number, dissents and concurrences, and footnotes for this case.

Learn more about what you receive with purchase of this case.

Berger v. Brandon

October 22, 2010

LEO BERGER, PLAINTIFF,
v.
J.T. BRANDON, ET AL., DEFENDANTS.



The opinion of the court was delivered by: Garland E. Burrell, Jr. United States District Judge

ORDER DENYING APPLICATION TO CONTINUE LAST LAW AND MOTION HEARING DATE

Plaintiff's ex parte application for an order changing the last law and motion hearing date prescribed in the scheduling order is denied because Plaintiff fails to demonstrate that the amendment he seeks is justified under Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 16's "good cause" standard. See Zivkovic v. Southern California Edison Co., 302 F.3d 1080, 1088 (9th Cir. 2002) (stating "'good cause'" must be demonstrated to justify "modifying the scheduling order, as required by Fed.R.Civ.P. 16(b)."). Further, to grant the application would necessitate continuing the final pretrial conference and trial dates.

20101022

© 1992-2010 VersusLaw ...

Buy This Entire Record For $7.95

Download the entire decision to receive the complete text, official citation,
docket number, dissents and concurrences, and footnotes for this case.

Learn more about what you receive with purchase of this case.