Searching over 5,500,000 cases.


searching
Buy This Entire Record For $7.95

Official citation and/or docket number and footnotes (if any) for this case available with purchase.

Learn more about what you receive with purchase of this case.

Berger v. Brandon

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA


October 22, 2010

LEO BERGER, PLAINTIFF,
v.
J.T. BRANDON, ET AL., DEFENDANTS.

The opinion of the court was delivered by: Garland E. Burrell, Jr. United States District Judge

ORDER DENYING APPLICATION TO CONTINUE LAST LAW AND MOTION HEARING DATE

Plaintiff's ex parte application for an order changing the last law and motion hearing date prescribed in the scheduling order is denied because Plaintiff fails to demonstrate that the amendment he seeks is justified under Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 16's "good cause" standard. See Zivkovic v. Southern California Edison Co., 302 F.3d 1080, 1088 (9th Cir. 2002) (stating "'good cause'" must be demonstrated to justify "modifying the scheduling order, as required by Fed.R.Civ.P. 16(b)."). Further, to grant the application would necessitate continuing the final pretrial conference and trial dates.

20101022

© 1992-2010 VersusLaw Inc.



Buy This Entire Record For $7.95

Official citation and/or docket number and footnotes (if any) for this case available with purchase.

Learn more about what you receive with purchase of this case.